It is currently Thu Jan 18, 2018 9:29 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 2:49 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2005 1:59 pm
Location: Cheltenham, England
Revolution

Image

A tour-de-force of epic filmmaking set against the American War of Independence. Al Pacino heads a stellar British/American cast (Nastassja Kinski, Donald Sutherland, Joan Plowright and Annie Lennox) in this definitive version of Hugh Hudson's powerfully unsentimental film.

Single father Tom Dobb (played with dogged resilience by Al Pacino) struggles hopelessly against the violent course of history to protect his only son, meeting many obstacles and hardships along the way. Accompanied by John Corigliano's poignant score, Hudson's 1985 film is an uncompromising evocation of chaos, squalor and upheaval of war which he has re-cut and updated with a new voice over by Al Pacino.

Specs:

- Standard Definition and High Definition presentation of The Director's Cut (DVD & Blu-ray)
- Optional High Definition presentation of Original Theatrical Cut (Blu-ray only)
- Revisiting Revolution (2008, 23 mins): Al Pacino and Hugh Hudson in conversation (DVD only)
- Original theatrical trailer (DVD only)
- Revisiting Revolution (2012, 13 mins TBC): Hugh Hudson talks about the making of Revolution, accompanied by production stills by celebrated photographers David Bailey and Don McCullum
- Deleted scenes: Re-cutting Revolution (21 mins TBC): a look at the differences between the different versions of the film


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 3:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
antnield wrote:
Yes, the Hugh Hudson film from 1985 with Al Pacino.

The BBFC have just classifed both cuts of the film for BFI Video. No further info, although here says it will be Blu-ray.

Well, I've been asked to cover both cuts in my booklet essay, so it's a pretty safe bet that they'll both be included!

I don't know any of the other specs, though - but I understand Hugh Hudson is involved.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 12:04 pm
Does Warner control this title in the UK as well-i.e. is there the possibility of more down the line from them than this and The Devils?


Last edited by Cronenfly on Fri Jan 20, 2012 4:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jan 20, 2012 6:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin
Excellent... Now I can feel ABSOLUTE BEGINNERS coming to Flipside, but perhaps even now that would be too much hubris exposed for those involved in the production...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:32 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 1:56 pm
Location: Dublin
Hudson's REVOLUTION dual format on 18 June...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Wed Feb 22, 2012 10:15 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
No great surprise, given that it's licensed from Warner, but Revolution is definitely Region B.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:18 pm 

Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2011 11:12 am
Is the movie really as bad as it looks considering its 8% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and four Razzie nominations?


Last edited by Calvin on Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:30 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Calvin wrote:
Is the movie really as bad as it looks considering it's 8% rating on Rotten Tomatoes and four Razzie nominations?

Bear in mind that the vast majority of those reviews (if not all of them) will be of the original 1985 release version, which even Hugh Hudson admits was very seriously flawed - it was rushed through post-production at breakneck speed in a doomed attempt to qualify for the Oscars that year. And, much like Heaven's Gate five years earlier, mocking it became something of a national and indeed international sport, most cruelly in the form of the Comic Strip's The Strike a few years later, which is based around a prolonged piss-take of Pacino's performance.

But the Revolution Revisited cut is a different matter - I doubt anyone's going to hail the film as an undiscovered masterpiece (though it's worth noting that even the 1985 version had its champions - in fact, I believe the near-rave review in the Monthly Film Bulletin is being reproduced in the booklet), but the new Pacino voiceover makes it far clearer what's going on (an almost crippling problem with the original version), and Hudson's original concept of a worm's eye view of great historical events is much easier to follow. I was a little worried that the additions might end up explaining too much, but it's more sparing than I'd feared from the wodge of information conveyed at the start.

And if nothing else, the film has genuine ambition - Hudson's models were things like Peter Watkins' Culloden rather than big sweeping costume epics.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Typically I had bought Revolution Revisited on Region 1 DVD about six months before this announcement! The Revisiting Revolution featurette is repeated from that release. This looks far better though with the inclusion of the theatrical cut and being released Dual Format.

MichaelB wrote:
And, much like Heaven's Gate five years earlier, mocking it became something of a national and indeed international sport, most cruelly in the form of the Comic Strip's The Strike a few years later, which is based around a prolonged piss-take of Pacino's performance.

Ah, yes The Strike - the parody being that it was a big Hollywood film doing a hack-job on historical events by creating a torrid romantic saga set in 1980s Britain between two deeply unsexy people, Miner's Union leader Arthur Scargill and Margaret Thatcher. Starring 'Pacino' as Scargill and 'Meryl Streep' as Thatcher!

Here's a clip!


Last edited by colinr0380 on Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:00 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
colinr0380 wrote:
Ah, yes The Strike - the parody being that it was a big Hollywood film doing a hack-job on historical events by creating a torrid romantic saga set in 1980s Britain between two deeply unsexy people, Miner's Union leader Arthur Scargill and Margaret Thatcher. Starring 'Pacino' as Scargill and 'Meryl Streep' as Thatcher!

Meryl Streep played Mrs Scargill - Thatcher wasn't featured at all.

And it was particularly unfair on Revolution because the Pacino parody implied - and almost certainly reinforced the notion amongst people who hadn't seen it (and I'm sure far more people watched The Strike than ever saw Revolution) - that Hudson's film was a moronic big-budget Hollywoodisation of history, which it absolutely wasn't.

Quite the reverse, in fact: whether he succeeded is still very much open to debate, but Hudson was actually attempting to make something much closer to the film that Alexei Sayle's scriptwriter in The Strike wanted to make - a look at how great political events (the American Revolution, the miners' strike) impacted on ordinary men and women on the ground.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
Ah, my mistake about 'Streep' playing Thatcher. I'd hate to live in a world where that happened!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm
MichaelB wrote:
Quite the reverse, in fact: whether he succeeded is still very much open to debate, but Hudson was actually attempting to make something much closer to the film that Alexei Sayle's scriptwriter in The Strike wanted to make - a look at how great political events (the American Revolution, the miners' strike) impacted on ordinary men and women on the ground.

This sounds like the perfect opportunity to yet again promote Bill Douglas' Comrades. If Michael's description above sounds like a film you want to see, run don't walk.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 1:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:22 pm
Location: Cornwall, U.K.
I would agree with MichaelB that Heaven's Gate is a good reference point for Revolution in that it's a film that was remarkably underrated at the time and clearly presents how the costs of social upheaval weigh most heavily on those without wealth and power, who will also not directly benefit from the changes being fought for. I wasn't aware that Culloden was an influence but that makes absolute sense, particularly considering the scene in Culloden where the Highlanders are individually introduced and are shown to have been forced into fighting for whichever side their laird is on. Pacino's star power is perhaps a problem in this reading but I found his performance to be superb and also very moving in his relationship to his son.

In fact, I would argue that all three films which caused the sinking of Goldcrest (this, The Mission and Absolute Beginners) are highly underrated examples of mainstream British film-making. They may all be flawed, but at least they have ambition, vision and something to say. Much better this overreaching than staid and predictable films such as The King's Speech and others of is ilk.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Sat Mar 17, 2012 5:42 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
AidanKing wrote:
I wasn't aware that Culloden was an influence but that makes absolute sense, particularly considering the scene in Culloden where the Highlanders are individually introduced and are shown to have been forced into fighting for whichever side their laird is on. Pacino's star power is perhaps a problem in this reading but I found his performance to be superb and also very moving in his relationship to his son.

Part of the problem is that the film was originally conceived as a medium-budget effort without major stars - and if Hudson had ultimately gone down that route, the Watkins influence might have been rather clearer. But once Pacino got involved, it became a big-budget major-star vehicle by default, complete with associated expectations that generally weren't fulfilled.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Sun Mar 18, 2012 8:04 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 17, 2012 12:22 pm
Location: Cornwall, U.K.
Any idea how Pacino came to be involved: was it a consequence of needing a star to secure a larger budget? (I think he was put off film acting for a while because of the dismissive, and unfair in my opinion, reaction to his performance).

A medium budget film would probably have been more successful, but I think the scale of the piece (number of extras, superb use of landscape shots and so on) does help the film's view of the poor paying all the consequences, and initially reaping few of the benefits, of historical change.

I also hope that the voiceover narration doesn't clarify too much because the fact that the main protagonists don't fully understand what is going on, and are consequently disorientated as a result, also assists the political thrust of the film as far as I can see.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Wed Mar 21, 2012 12:01 pm 

Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 10:18 am
MichaelB wrote:
Bear in mind that the vast majority of those reviews (if not all of them) will be of the original 1985 release version, which even Hugh Hudson admits was very seriously flawed - it was rushed through post-production at breakneck speed in a doomed attempt to qualify for the Oscars that year. And, much like Heaven's Gate five years earlier, mocking it became something of a national and indeed international sport, most cruelly in the form of the Comic Strip's The Strike a few years later, which is based around a prolonged piss-take of Pacino's performance.

But the Revolution Revisited cut is a different matter...

I remember the negative reviews at the time and didn't bother with it; Derek Jarman was particularly scathing towards Hudson and the whole Goldcrest operation. I understand why original theatre cuts can distort the film's good intentions; the theatre cut of Heaven's Gate is a travesty compared to the full version, which is a surprisingly good film, and it's a pity it hasn't had the same revisionist treatment Revolution is receiving. It will be interesting to compare and contrast the two versions. I'm in, but only on rental.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 2:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Full specs announced:
Quote:
Revolution: The Director’s Cut
A film by Hugh Hudson
Al Pacino, Donald Sutherland, Nastassja Kinski, Richard O’Brien, Joan Plowright

 
"Profound, poetic and original" Philip French
 
Al Pacino heads a stellar cast in this powerful, unsentimental depiction of the American War of Independence. Since its original release in 1985, director Hugh Hudson (Chariots of Fire) and Al Pacino have returned to the film, making several changes including the addition of a voice-over for Pacino’s character.
 
Released on 18 June, this Dual Format Edition contains the definitive Director’s Cut of Revolution on DVD and Blu-ray, and includes new interviews with Hugh Hudson which explore the history of the film’s production and the differences between the different versions.
 
Epic in scale and execution, Revolution follows the fortunes of single father Tom Dobb (played with dogged resilience by Al Pacino) as he fights to protect Ned, his only son, against the violent course of history. The supporting cast includes Annie Lennox, Joan Plowright, Steven Berkoff, Dexter Fletcher and Sid Owen.
 
Superb performances, breathtaking set pieces and a poignant score by John Corigliano, played by the National Philharmonic Orchestra, combine to produce an uncompromising evocation of the chaos and squalor of war.
 
As well as Revisiting Revolution in which Al Pacino and Hugh Hudson discuss their vision for Revolution: The Director’s Cut, two newly commissioned interviews feature Hudson talking about the making of the film, illustrated with production stills by renowned photographers David Bailey and Don McCullin, and about the various changes he made to the original film to create his new cut.
 
Click here to see the original theatrical trailer (90 secs).
 
Special features
* Presented in both Standard Definition and High Definition;
* Optional presentation of the original theatrical version of Revolution (Blu-ray only);
* Revisiting Revolution (2008, 23 mins, DVD only): Al Pacino and Hugh Hudson discuss their vision for Revolution: The Director’s Cut;
* Hugh Hudson on Revolution (2012, 12 mins): Hugh Hudson on the making of Revolution, illustrated with production stills by David Bailey and Don McCullin;
* Re-cutting Revolution: the Deleted Scenes (2012, 21 mins, DVD only): Hugh Hudson on the changes he made to create his 2009 cut;
* Original theatrical trailer (DVD only);
* Optional Dolby surround 5.1 audio;
* Extensive booklet with essays by Nick Redman, Philip French, John Corigliano, Michael Brooke; reviews and a director biography.
 
RRP: £19.99 / cat. no. BFIB1136 / Cert 15
UK and Norway / 1985 and 2009 / colour / 115 mins / English language, optional feature subtitles for the hard-of-hearing / Original aspect ratio 2.35:1
Disc 1: BD50 / 1080p / 24fps / audio 5.1 DTS-HD / 2.0 24-bit PCM
Disc 2: DVD-9 / PAL / audio Dolby digital 2.0 320 kbps


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Mon Jun 04, 2012 5:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Mondo Digital.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Thu Jun 07, 2012 11:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan
DVDBeaver review although he doesn't go into the details of the DVD extras.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 9:22 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 15, 2007 8:34 pm
Location: Stavanger, Norway
Monsieur Tooze wrote:
This is only single-layered and one of the earlier classic brought to hi-def disc
What does this mean?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:00 am 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:22 am
Location: The Room
RobertAltman wrote:
Monsieur Tooze wrote:
This is only single-layered and one of the earlier classic brought to hi-def disc
What does this mean?


Apparently no films made before 1985 have been released on blu ray in Beaverland.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 11:05 am 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Maybe he thought it was a documentary


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 4:30 pm 

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 12:49 pm
Maybe he thought it was made in 1776.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:35 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 25, 2008 4:57 am
Location: East Coast, USA
Well according to his scan, the feature file is "single-layered" (i.e., not bigger than a BD-25) at 16,676,413,440 bytes, but then he goes on to say that the cuts are seamlessly branched, which doesn't make sense with a disc size of 44,915,421,136 bytes, considering that there is only an 11-minute difference in the cuts and there is only one 12-minute extra on the Blu-ray...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Revolution
PostPosted: Fri Jun 08, 2012 5:51 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
McCrutchy wrote:
Well according to his scan, the feature file is "single-layered" (i.e., not bigger than a BD-25) at 16,676,413,440 bytes, but then he goes on to say that the cuts are seamlessly branched, which doesn't make sense with a disc size of 44,915,421,136 bytes, considering that there is only an 11-minute difference in the cuts and there is only one 12-minute extra on the Blu-ray...

It's more complicated than that, because quite a bit of the footage in the director's cut has a different soundtrack.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 37 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection