#72
Post
by zedz » Tue Jul 31, 2007 10:11 pm
I'm actually less affected by this latest double blow than I was by the deaths of Edward Yang or Robert Altman.
In the case of the former, the reasons are obvious: he was responsible for four films that mean more to me than anything by Bergman or Antonioni (with the possible exception of L'eclisse), and he potentially had as many masterpieces left to make. For me, Yang was hands down the "greatest living filmmaker", to the extent that that formulation ever means anything.
Altman is a slightly different case. His career was so erratic and energetic that you never knew when he was going to make his next great film, and he'd been on a good streak in recent years. Plus, even his films from thirty years ago still seem alive, fresh and different whenever I go back to them. He was very much a 'living filmmaker' who made 'living films', and his death, however predictable, came as a blow.
Bergman and Antonioni, on the other hand, hadn't managed to avoid the creative declines (at least in their filmmaking work) that effectively sealed off their canon many years ago, however many footnotes they might manage to squeeze in during their twilight years. They were both great artists, but they were already great artists of a previous age, and had left fine, finite creative legacies and lived long, I hope fulfilling, lives. No surprise about their passing, and no shock either. Nothing personal.