Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

News on Criterion and Janus Films.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

#126 Post by swo17 » Sat Sep 06, 2008 12:59 am

Mr Pixies wrote:you guys know that for every one person who watches a film, metaphysically two more people are compelled to watch the same film. I vow to watch Border Radio five times a day, every day, and soon enough all of you will be watching it every day!
I stopped reading your post once it said Border Radio. 8-)

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

#127 Post by knives » Mon Sep 08, 2008 12:50 am

Not to sound dumb (which I know I'm almost doing) but is Border Radio really that bad and if so, why'd it get a release in the first place. Also out of curiousity, how'd Hopscotch get that level of infamy.

User avatar
CSM126
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:22 am
Location: The Room
Contact:

#128 Post by CSM126 » Mon Sep 08, 2008 2:13 am

knives wrote:how'd Hopscotch get that level of infamy.
Hopscotch gets a bad rap primarily because it was released in a very slow year for Criterion (like one or two discs per month and mostly big name directors and films). People were kinda miffed when this largely-overlooked film that most people call average at best got Criterion's time when they were having such a slow time getting the great films out there. It just seemed out of place at the time.

If Hopscotch had been held off for another year, it probably wouldn't get the shit it does. It isn't even that bad (personally, I like it; better than Horse's Mouth, even, when it comes to CC's Neame releases).

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

#129 Post by knives » Mon Sep 08, 2008 10:54 pm

That makes a lot of sense, thanks. The plot makes it out to be at least okay which spiked my curiosity.

User avatar
skuhn8
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2004 4:46 pm
Location: Chico, CA

#130 Post by skuhn8 » Tue Sep 09, 2008 3:32 am

I don't know anything about the slow year referred to. I just know that I can't stand Hopscotch. [I love Horse's Mouth, btw]. I'm sure Border Radio has its fans as well, but I'd rather cut my dick off and watch the neighbor's dog masticate it than watch that thing again. Hell, I'd rather watch Armageddon (sic[k]) again.

UKUser

Criterion Sales

#131 Post by UKUser » Fri Dec 12, 2008 11:53 am

I wonder what proportion of Criterion sales are outside the US - significant numbers?

This becomes pertinent once CRiterion make the decision to region code its blu rays.

One fellow UK messenger has already lamented this move. THe replies recommended a second compatible blu ray player without a second thought to the cost on top of the cost of the higher criterion disc prices. Film fans like myself will settle for less comprehensive European blu ray releases, and say ByeBye to Criterion, rather than get suckered into spending a lot more money on a player to do the same job as the one we own already - in order to play discs that are going to cost yet more money. So Criterion's shift into the blu ray market will change its customer base, too.

IF european sales of Criterion stock are negligible, then all this is a big So What. If not, if there are many customers such as myself who were on the verge of buying 5 Criterion blu rays this month alone, then how asinine to alienate a European customer base that has been on board, in some cases, for years.

Region coding kicks free enterprise in the teeth, of course, if we take free enterprise to mean the freedom of the market - the freedom of the buyer to shop around.

That's the overwhelming reason why I preferred Toshiba's HD system: universally region free.

User avatar
arsonfilms
Joined: Wed Nov 02, 2005 12:53 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Contact:

Re: Criterion Sales

#132 Post by arsonfilms » Fri Dec 12, 2008 12:11 pm

While I certainly don't disagree with you, the larger issue is territorial rights which have already been discussed at length here on the forum (welcome, by the way). Criterion is only licensed to sell movies in North America, at which point they aren't really legally allowed to factor foreign sales into anything. Foreign sales have to be something of an "icing on the cake" proposition because other companies own the rights in other territories, which is why everything is region-coded and Criterion doesn't ship overseas. It isn't really a business decision to be questioned, it's a contractual obligation.

That said, from a consumer standpoint I absolutely agree that region coding is a pain. Filmmakers though would have a tough time making money if they couldn't split up territorial rights to sell off.

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#133 Post by ianungstad » Fri Dec 12, 2008 3:49 pm

Well I don't know how much it reflects the sales at Criterion but 2008 was the most profitable year ever for Image Entertainment according to recently released financial statements. I may not be remembering correctly but I think a press release from a year or so ago, stated that Criterion made up around 25% of Image's overall revenues.

ryan11
Joined: Wed Dec 17, 2008 9:39 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#134 Post by ryan11 » Wed Jan 14, 2009 3:08 am

ianungstad wrote:Well I don't know how much it reflects the sales at Criterion but 2008 was the most profitable year ever for Image Entertainment according to recently released financial statements. I may not be remembering correctly but I think a press release from a year or so ago, stated that Criterion made up around 25% of Image's overall revenues.
Was it profit or turnover? Criterion would have sold plenty of DVDs, but what percentage of sales came from the many heavily discounted sales over the last 8 or so months. Criterion were hoping to empty the warehouse before moving, and they must have been offering huge discounts for Amazon, Dvdempire, Dvdplanet, Deepdiscount etc to have a front page sale. So, perhaps the sales were there, but profits were modest.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#135 Post by Antoine Doinel » Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:05 pm

On Criterion's FB page, they just had a contest worth a $10 gift certificate: first one to answer what their bestselling 2009 title was wins.

The correct answer?
SpoilerShow
Science Is Fiction: 23 Films by Jean Painleve
=D>

I guess that throws out the "Ben Button pays for [insert title here]" arguments.

User avatar
HelenLawson
Joined: Thu Jan 17, 2008 3:20 pm
Location: San Francisco

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#136 Post by HelenLawson » Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:14 pm

It's the bestselling title on their website, not the bestseller overall. I'm sure there's a bit of disparity between what sells on Criterion.com versus Amazon et. al.

User avatar
Antoine Doinel
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2006 1:22 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Contact:

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#137 Post by Antoine Doinel » Thu Sep 24, 2009 6:19 pm

Oops -- my eyes totally missed that detail.

User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#138 Post by dwk » Mon Aug 28, 2023 10:39 pm

Time to resurrect a 14 year old thread. Glenn Kenny tweeted that "A reliable source" told him that Criterion's best selling Blu-ray is It's A Mad Mad Mad Mad World.

Tuco
Joined: Sun Jan 24, 2010 4:57 pm
Location: Twin Cities, MN

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#139 Post by Tuco » Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:10 am

Curling up in to fetal position now.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#140 Post by MichaelB » Tue Aug 29, 2023 7:01 am

Tuco wrote:
Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:10 am
Curling up in to fetal position now.
Why do you have a problem with that? It's almost certainly subsidised any number of less profitable releases, and nobody's forcing you personally to watch it with eyes clamped open like Malcolm McDowell in A Clockwork Orange.

Similarly, I imagine few devotees of BFI releases pay much attention to the British Transport Films catalogue, but there's a reason why it's gone to fifteen separate two-disc DVD editions, two Blu-ray volumes and multiple reissues in various permutations. (Taking over most of the BTF catalogue when British Rail was privatised in the mid-1990s was one of the most commercially astute decisions the BFI ever made!)

User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#141 Post by therewillbeblus » Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:37 am

I’m just surprised that anyone’s surprised. After all it’s a mad ma-

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#142 Post by FrauBlucher » Tue Aug 29, 2023 12:06 pm

I’m not surprised it’s a best seller, I am surprised it’s THE best seller. I guess a UHD is right around the corner

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#143 Post by hearthesilence » Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:43 pm

It's surprising to me because I don't know a single person IRL who has ever referenced a single joke from it or even mentioned it by name, and this includes the few times I've seen the homage in that episode of The Simpsons with a bunch of dorm mates. I don't think age has anything to do with it - I remember classmates making references to Abbott and Costello, The Honeymooners, the Marx Brothers, etc. whether it's a joke in a school play, Halloween or just goofing around, but never anything about that movie.

User avatar
yoloswegmaster
Joined: Tue Nov 01, 2016 3:57 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#144 Post by yoloswegmaster » Tue Aug 29, 2023 3:11 pm

At least we know of one big director who is a fan of it

I'm going to watch it one of these days just to see if it's actually as bad as people on here make it out to be. I will also be doing to same with the Norman Mailer films that were released in that Eclipse set.

User avatar
FrauBlucher
Joined: Mon Jul 15, 2013 8:28 pm
Location: Greenwich Village

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#145 Post by FrauBlucher » Tue Aug 29, 2023 3:15 pm

Image
Domino!

User avatar
tolbs1010
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 7:01 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#146 Post by tolbs1010 » Tue Aug 29, 2023 4:36 pm

Terry Thomas and especially Dick Shawn are very funny in it. Shawn has only 2 or 3 scenes but I laugh out loud every time I see them. Overall, it's a mixed bag and too long, but I can see why it's popular.

I can think of 20 or 30 Criterion titles that are much bigger headscratchers as to why they are in the Collection. I'm sure we all have titles that we like to shit on as being unworthy of the Criterion label. At least this one is helping to subsidize some lesser-known titles, some of which we will eventually shit on as being unworthy. A perfect circle. Very low stakes. Bring on the 4K of Armageddon.

User avatar
Fiery Angel
Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:59 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#147 Post by Fiery Angel » Tue Aug 29, 2023 5:13 pm


User avatar
therewillbeblus
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2015 3:40 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#148 Post by therewillbeblus » Tue Aug 29, 2023 5:41 pm

hearthesilence wrote:
Tue Aug 29, 2023 2:43 pm
It's surprising to me because I don't know a single person IRL who has ever referenced a single joke from it or even mentioned it by name
I've only ever seen this movie once, on a double VHS in elementary school, put on by my friend's parents who were convinced we would adore it, and we couldn't have been more bored. These were pretty cool parents, too, and perhaps the least intrusive around forcing their tastes in art onto others. If I recall correctly, other parents joined the effusive praise around it when we expressed how awful we felt it was. I'd be curious about the demographics for not just collecting physical media, but this title in particular, because I think there's a generation of non-cinephiles who got a lot out of this and are likely the target audience contributing to this statistic

I don't know if it's about joke-referencing as much as attraction to a road movie containing a nonstop cameo 'Who's Who' train of "fun" for people who grew up with certain icons at a certain time

cdobbs
Joined: Tue Jul 28, 2009 12:45 am

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#149 Post by cdobbs » Tue Aug 29, 2023 5:59 pm

https://twitter.com/Glenn__Kenny/status ... 3591547058

This is the tweet in question. In the context of the thread it’s quite probably a joke. In either case, it’s simply not plausible.

User avatar
Blutarsky
Joined: Thu Nov 30, 2017 10:09 pm

Re: Best Sellers, Worst Sellers

#150 Post by Blutarsky » Tue Aug 29, 2023 10:39 pm

cdobbs wrote:
Tue Aug 29, 2023 5:59 pm
https://twitter.com/Glenn__Kenny/status ... 3591547058

This is the tweet in question. In the context of the thread it’s quite probably a joke. In either case, it’s simply not plausible.
The moment I saw the tweet and claim, my first thought that came to mind was, “What about the Wes Anderson’s?” Back when the Criterion website would display comments and your collection (ugh, the gold ol’ times), The Royal Tenenbaums had over 10,000 individuals logging it in their collection.

As Wes has grown ever more popular in subsequent years, I cannot imagine all his movies NOT being one of the best sellers if not one of them being the top seller.

Post Reply