Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

News on Criterion and Janus Films.
Locked
Message
Author
User avatar
tarpilot
Joined: Thu Jan 20, 2011 10:48 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2326 Post by tarpilot » Wed Aug 29, 2012 1:10 am

scoundrel wrote:
duck duck wrote:I think the new one took so long because I assume most people haven't heard "Qatsi" pronounced out loud.
Unless you've seen the film, in which case the drone has been pounded into your head with a Glass hammer.
I miss the applause smiley

User avatar
JimmyTango
Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 12:51 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2327 Post by JimmyTango » Wed Aug 29, 2012 3:29 am

scoundrel wrote:
duck duck wrote:I think the new one took so long because I assume most people haven't heard "Qatsi" pronounced out loud.
Unless you've seen the film, in which case the drone has been pounded into your head with a Glass hammer.
Duck Duck only watches movies "ironically" :roll:

duck duck
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2328 Post by duck duck » Wed Aug 29, 2012 5:07 am

I'm sorry I haven't seen all three of these films. If you watch films on cable they don't pronounce the name clearly.

User avatar
dx23
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 8:52 pm
Location: Puerto Rico

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2329 Post by dx23 » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:08 pm

Image

bamwc2
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2330 Post by bamwc2 » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:19 pm

I have to admit that the greaser lambs have got me beat.

User avatar
pzadvance
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2331 Post by pzadvance » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:21 pm

Criterion Cast suggests "Bad Lambs" = Badlands?
Last edited by pzadvance on Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2332 Post by knives » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:22 pm

The jacket and shirt combo is really familiar. I want to say either Rumble Fish or Van Sant.

bamwc2
Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 11:54 am

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2333 Post by bamwc2 » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:24 pm

pzadvance wrote:Criterion Corner suggests "Bad Lambs" = Badlands?
Sounds right. Sheen certainly dressed like a greaser in there.

duck duck
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2334 Post by duck duck » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:24 pm

silent lambs?

User avatar
solaris72
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:03 pm
Location: Baltimore, MD

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2335 Post by solaris72 » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:25 pm

Image

User avatar
RyanGallagher
Joined: Fri Jan 01, 2010 4:03 pm
Location: Portland, OR
Contact:

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2336 Post by RyanGallagher » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:35 pm

pzadvance wrote:Criterion Corner suggests "Bad Lambs" = Badlands?
I think you mean CriterionCast not Criterion Corner.

User avatar
pzadvance
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2337 Post by pzadvance » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:39 pm

RyanGallagher wrote:
pzadvance wrote:Criterion Corner suggests "Bad Lambs" = Badlands?
I think you mean CriterionCast not Criterion Corner.
Edited to strike my blunder from the record.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2338 Post by zedz » Thu Sep 27, 2012 5:56 pm

Their puns aren't even homophones anymore. That's pretty lamb-ass.

User avatar
pzadvance
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2339 Post by pzadvance » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:00 pm

zedz wrote:Their puns aren't even homophones anymore. That's pretty lamb-ass.
True. As far as puns go, this one is a piece of sheep.

duck duck
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2340 Post by duck duck » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:01 pm

That's it. Sheen wears a jean jacket and white t-shirt the whole film.

User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2341 Post by HistoryProf » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:08 pm

but that looks like a black leather jacket and there's two of them? Maybe if the other was wearing a ratty sundress i'd buy it. doesn't seem to fit to me.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2342 Post by matrixschmatrix » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:12 pm

Couldn't be Killer of Sheep, could it?

User avatar
pzadvance
Joined: Mon Nov 21, 2011 7:24 pm
Location: Los Angeles, CA

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2343 Post by pzadvance » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:13 pm

HistoryProf wrote:but that looks like a black leather jacket and there's two of them? Maybe if the other was wearing a ratty sundress i'd buy it. doesn't seem to fit to me.
Well in order for the pun to achieve the appropriate pluralization, there'd need to be two bad-looking lambs. You're right though, if that's what it is, it's one of their sloppier clues.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2344 Post by knives » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:14 pm

matrixschmatrix wrote:Couldn't be Killer of Sheep, could it?
Nope. Milestone wouldn't rent it out and they'd be wacky sheep in that case. I'm kind of hoping it is Drugstore Cowboy instead. Something seems off about the Badlands suggestion.

duck duck
Joined: Sat Nov 26, 2011 11:45 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2345 Post by duck duck » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:18 pm

I thought "killer of sheep" and tried to post it earlier but the site was too crowded. Which gave me time to think but why would lambs kill sheep? a wolf would be a better clue.
Drugstore Cowboy has too obvious of a pun picture...

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2346 Post by swo17 » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:24 pm

This probably isn't it, but what about Shanks (of lamb), which includes a gang of bikers at the end?

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2347 Post by knives » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:26 pm

Even though they're no longer pursuing a release unfortunately I believe Olive still has the rights.

ianungstad
Joined: Wed Mar 16, 2005 9:20 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2348 Post by ianungstad » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:31 pm

Unlikely but I think Rebel without a Cause also fits the clue. The film is essentially a greek tragedy with Plato being the film's sacrificial lamb. I posted a few months ago that some Ray biographer mentioned that Criterion has several Nic Ray films in the works.

It probably is Badlands. The pun is pretty lame. Paul Maher Jr. who runs the One Big Soul Malick fansite and recently published a book on Malick has been insisting that a Criterion release is in the works. It would make more sense it it were a male and female. The image looks like 2 dudes to me. Might just be a lousy drawing.

I was on google trying to somehow tie lambs to Richard Brooks' In Cold Blood. Not much luck. :(

User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2349 Post by captveg » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:33 pm

Warner would never hand over Rebel Without a Cause (or any of the three James Dean films for that matter).

User avatar
The Narrator Returns
Joined: Tue Nov 15, 2011 6:35 pm

Re: Criterion Newsletter (Part 2)

#2350 Post by The Narrator Returns » Thu Sep 27, 2012 6:34 pm

Even if it is a pretty lame pun, shouldn't we all be ecstatic that Badlands is finally coming?

Locked