It is currently Sat Jan 20, 2018 6:55 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:52 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
It's not really fair to compare this to any actual Lear adaptation, considering Godard famously only adapted the first and last three pages of the play


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 7:54 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
domino harvey wrote:
It's not really fair to compare this to any actual Lear adaptation, considering Godard famously only adapted the first and last three pages of the play

;-)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:26 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 10:52 pm
Location: Canada
dda1996a wrote:
I really disliked Godard's Lear, but then I only saw Breathless and Vivre Sa Vie beforehand. Does knowledge and familiarity with his earlier work make his difficult 80s work more palpable?
I most likely would have disliked it too, like a lot of Godard's output, if I hadn't seen it in the context of carefully going through his oeuvre with several books in hand. Makes all the difference. I'm sure that's true to varying degrees for a lot of film directors, but never more so this one.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 2:43 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 17, 2016 3:43 pm
Location: USA
Image

That is one sad melange of poorly juxtaposed typefaces. The title logotype looks better suited to an '80s hair metal band's album cover.
Admittedly, I've not yet seen the film. Could the heavy metal style font be intentional?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:23 am
Location: Florida
Rayon Vert wrote:
if I hadn't seen it in the context of carefully going through his oeuvre with several books in hand.

To get the fullest possible appreciation, book reading is definetly essential. But one can get by just fine without that, as long as more than a few viewings are allowed. It's just that Lear is probably not the best intro for this period.

dda1996a wrote:
I really disliked Godard's Lear, but then I only saw Breathless and Vivre Sa Vie beforehand. Does knowledge and familiarity with his earlier work make his difficult 80s work more palpable?

Only in the sense of knowing ahead of time that whatever detectable spikiness in his sixties work is turned up way past eleven later on.

I'd go with any one of these first before jumping in elsewhere in this part of his career: Detective, First Name Carmen, Passion, Detective, Oh Woe Is Me, Hail Mary, Notre Musique, Forever Mozart, In Praise of Love.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 3:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Sep 20, 2009 5:23 am
Location: Florida
xoconostle wrote:
Admittedly, I've not yet seen the film. Could the heavy metal style font be intentional?

It doesn't reflect the film. It's as disconnected as the tag line beneath it. But you've got the right idea. It does reflect the time period. Dokken rules!*

*Given that the film came out in '87, a few years after Dokken's brief heyday, Whitesnake may be the better example.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 4:42 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 08, 2016 12:47 am
xoconostle wrote:
Image

That is one sad melange of poorly juxtaposed typefaces. The title logotype looks better suited to an '80s hair metal band's album cover.
Admittedly, I've not yet seen the film. Could the heavy metal style font be intentional?



Canon Group conceive the 80's title logotype onto the poster so they could lurked the Chuck Norris audience into seeing a Jean-Luc Godard picture!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC
Jesus, that looks like a logo of an '80s children's cartoon.
Image
Image
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:37 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Mar 17, 2009 5:58 pm
It also has a bit of
Image
to it.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 5:50 pm 

Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2015 6:14 am
Robot opens also immediately jumped to my head. It's just a typical 80s typeface


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 6:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jan 11, 2009 1:59 pm
It reminds me of the Cinemetal T shirts that the IFC Center in Manhattan sells.

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 07, 2017 10:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 08, 2014 10:52 pm
Location: Canada
Hilarious. Love the Ozu and the Ingmar.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 08, 2017 11:37 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 3:23 pm
It's got some of this too:

Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 4:11 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 08, 2004 4:30 pm
Location: Chapel-en-le-Frith, Derbyshire, UK
That reminds me that, as mentioned in this post, the Fassbinder T-shirt turns up in a scene in Gaspar Noé's Love! (NSFW: Language)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 09, 2017 6:44 pm 

Joined: Sun Oct 14, 2007 5:31 am
Those shirts were created by the fine people at Cinefile Video in Los Angeles. They also make a beautiful Philip Seymour Hoffman tote bag.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 40 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection