17 Marketa Lazarová
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
- jbeall
- Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am
- Location: Atlanta-ish
- Der Müde Tod
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 9:50 am
jbeall wrote:the suspense is killing me!
I've enjoyed all Second Run's releases in the past. Every single film was a blind buy for me, and I was always very pleasantly surprised by the film.
Sometimes, the transfer wasn't stellar, but I have started trusting Second Run to put out what they can afford to put out. I'll be happy to watch their Markéta Lazarová --
The complaints about an unseen release of this film already surpass the complaints about the lack of a better quality re-release of films like Andrei Rublev at this forum.
Why don't you guys wait, watch, and then make up your minds whether you want a better release (and then complain with the right people who can pay for it)???
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
OK, I now have a dual-layer checkdisc containing the final transfer.
I haven't had anywhere close to a chance to watch it yet (I'm trying to clear an uninterrupted three hours out of this evening), but I can provide a few answers right now.
First of all, as everyone expected/feared, it's not sourced from the original negative. My various educated guesses turned out to be pretty much bang on - the bottom line is that without hefty funding from someone with deep pockets, probably associated with the Czech Ministry of Culture, there's no way a small DVD label could realistically have ponied up the cost on its own.
So why didn't they wait, as so many have suggested? Well, the one point that I missed (and I'm kicking myself, as it was so obvious) is that the clock is always ticking on DVD projects. Licensing deals are almost invariably for a limited time period, dating from the time the contract is signed, not from the final release date. This means that if you sign a five-year contract and spend four-and-a-half years trying to create the perfect DVD, you have just six months to recoup your expenditure before you have to take it out of circulation (or gamble that the rights are renewable, which may not be the case).
Now we know from this very thread that Second Run have been sitting on Marketa Lazarová rights for nearly two years (at least), as it's unlikely they'd have announced it in public if the contract hadn't been signed... so at some point or other they were going to reach a crunch point: do they write off their expenditure on the rights and any preliminary transfer/encoding work, or make the best of what they had?
Anyway, I've watched the opening scenes on my laptop, and it's a real shame that all this original-negative argument was allowed to poison the debate - because on the evidence of what I've seen so far, this is one of the very best transfers that Second Run have done for a forty-year-old film (i.e. far closer to Intimate Lighting than Mother Joan of the Angels). It's anamorphic, appears to be framed correctly, the greyscale has a perfectly acceptable dynamic range (i.e. we're talking proper black and white instead of grey and grey), and although there are some minor blemishes, they're not remotely distracting - and you almost certainly will be too diverted by Zdeněk Liška's ravishing score in any case.
I'll hopefully have watched the whole thing on a much bigger screen within the next 4-5 hours and will try to post framegrabs along with a more accurate account. But it's already clear that this is a phenomenal bargain for £12.99.
I haven't had anywhere close to a chance to watch it yet (I'm trying to clear an uninterrupted three hours out of this evening), but I can provide a few answers right now.
First of all, as everyone expected/feared, it's not sourced from the original negative. My various educated guesses turned out to be pretty much bang on - the bottom line is that without hefty funding from someone with deep pockets, probably associated with the Czech Ministry of Culture, there's no way a small DVD label could realistically have ponied up the cost on its own.
So why didn't they wait, as so many have suggested? Well, the one point that I missed (and I'm kicking myself, as it was so obvious) is that the clock is always ticking on DVD projects. Licensing deals are almost invariably for a limited time period, dating from the time the contract is signed, not from the final release date. This means that if you sign a five-year contract and spend four-and-a-half years trying to create the perfect DVD, you have just six months to recoup your expenditure before you have to take it out of circulation (or gamble that the rights are renewable, which may not be the case).
Now we know from this very thread that Second Run have been sitting on Marketa Lazarová rights for nearly two years (at least), as it's unlikely they'd have announced it in public if the contract hadn't been signed... so at some point or other they were going to reach a crunch point: do they write off their expenditure on the rights and any preliminary transfer/encoding work, or make the best of what they had?
Anyway, I've watched the opening scenes on my laptop, and it's a real shame that all this original-negative argument was allowed to poison the debate - because on the evidence of what I've seen so far, this is one of the very best transfers that Second Run have done for a forty-year-old film (i.e. far closer to Intimate Lighting than Mother Joan of the Angels). It's anamorphic, appears to be framed correctly, the greyscale has a perfectly acceptable dynamic range (i.e. we're talking proper black and white instead of grey and grey), and although there are some minor blemishes, they're not remotely distracting - and you almost certainly will be too diverted by Zdeněk Liška's ravishing score in any case.
I'll hopefully have watched the whole thing on a much bigger screen within the next 4-5 hours and will try to post framegrabs along with a more accurate account. But it's already clear that this is a phenomenal bargain for £12.99.
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Sadly, I can't - although it plays fine on my laptop, my domestic player can't handle DVD+R discs.
I don't particularly want to have to watch the whole thing on a 13" screen (certainly not when there's a 43" alternative), so I'm trying to convert it to DVD-R, but it's clearly not going to be a five-minute job - so I suspect I'm going to have to postpone a full viewing till tomorrow night.
But I'll try to get frame grabs uploaded tonight whatever happens.
UPDATE: And now I've just discovered that my burner can only burn dual-layer DVD+Rs, not DVD-Rs. So it looks like it's 13" or nothing...
I don't particularly want to have to watch the whole thing on a 13" screen (certainly not when there's a 43" alternative), so I'm trying to convert it to DVD-R, but it's clearly not going to be a five-minute job - so I suspect I'm going to have to postpone a full viewing till tomorrow night.
But I'll try to get frame grabs uploaded tonight whatever happens.
UPDATE: And now I've just discovered that my burner can only burn dual-layer DVD+Rs, not DVD-Rs. So it looks like it's 13" or nothing...
- What A Disgrace
- Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 10:34 pm
- Contact:
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Nope. Two were pursued, but neither turned out to be available. Though the final package will include a booklet with an essay by Peter Hames - and the film itself is hefty enough at 2:38:42.What A Disgrace wrote:I assume the disc does not contain any bonus features?
Interestingly enough, when you convert this from PAL to theatrical, it comes out at 165 mins 18 secs, which is three minutes longer than the 162 mins given by both the IMDB and the BFI database. The IMDB also claims 180 minutes as an alternative, but that looks suspiciously rounded to me.
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm
This was posted today on the IMDB message board for Marketa by someone under the moniker "Lakeywhite." Obviously have no idea how reliable he/she is, but it can't hurt to add to the speculation.
I recently assessed this film before it went off to be mastered onto DVD. I hope you enjoy it, the soundtrack has been improved (many crackles and pops have been removed) though the sync was out in places on the version I checked (I think that this was because the film was post dubbed originally), the picture has been treated too (though I didn't see the original so I can't tell by how much) I didn't see any major scratches or dirt. The contrast is still very high, I believe this is intentional as the contrast has been noted on another thread.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Here's a selection of framegrabs - genuinely random as I still haven't had a chance to watch the film yet.
(Tomorrow night, hopefully)
(Tomorrow night, hopefully)
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
I've just done tests, and it's definitely a side-effect of the frame grabbing process - the original freeze-frames look fine. It's never been an issue before as I normally reduce the size of the end result, but in this case I presented them in their original size. So don't worry!domino harvey wrote:what's the story with that rampant pixelation?
(UPDATE: since this exchange, I've uploaded better grabs to the same URL, so the "rampant pixilation" is no more.
Last edited by MichaelB on Sat Dec 01, 2007 4:20 pm, edited 3 times in total.
- Faeton
- Joined: Thu Sep 21, 2006 4:31 am
- Location: Madrid, Spain
- Contact:
ML is available for pre-order at Amazon.co.uk for 8,98 GBP
It's 9,99 GBP at other sites as play.com or Moviemail.
It's 9,99 GBP at other sites as play.com or Moviemail.
- domino harvey
- Dot Com Dom
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
No need, I already pre-ordered my copy from Amazon and truth be told it could look like your caps and for the ~$15 American it'd still be worth picking up. Glad to hear it doesn't look like that in motion thoMichaelB wrote:If you'd care to nominate a transfer that you think is absolutely perfect (and which I also have), I'll happily do frame grabs using the same process for comparison!
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
I've now watched the whole of Part 1 on a 43" CRT, and it generally looks gorgeous. Admittedly not quite up to the standard of Second Run's Intimate Lighting or My Way Home, largely because I felt the contrast was a tad high at times - though this isn't consistent across the print, as some shots look damn near perfect, so Lakeywhite's speculation may well be accurate about it possibly being intentional. But the print is in excellent physical condition for its age - there are occasional minor blemishes, but the images are so intricate and the camera movement so constant that these really aren't an issue.
As Lakeywhite observed, some of the sound is also poorly post-synced, but I'm convinced this is inherent in the original - the camera choreography is so spectacular at times that there's every likelihood that VláÄ
As Lakeywhite observed, some of the sound is also poorly post-synced, but I'm convinced this is inherent in the original - the camera choreography is so spectacular at times that there's every likelihood that VláÄ
- NABOB OF NOWHERE
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:30 pm
- Location: Brandywine River
Thanks to MichaelB for the early report on this. It's reassuring to hear it's not as scuzzy as the caps on the MoC site might have suggested . It seems that the highlights look clipped as a result of some contrast boosting but although my order was never under threat it's good to know I won't be watching this with gritted teeth.
-
- Joined: Mon Jul 25, 2005 6:04 pm
[quote="MichaelB"]I felt the contrast was a tad high at times - though this isn't consistent across the print, as some shots look damn near perfect, so Lakeywhite's speculation may well be accurate about it possibly being intentional. But the print is in excellent physical condition for its age - there are occasional minor blemishes, but the images are so intricate and the camera movement so constant that these really aren't an issue.
As Lakeywhite observed, some of the sound is also poorly post-synced, but I'm convinced this is inherent in the original - the camera choreography is so spectacular at times that there's every likelihood that VláÄ
As Lakeywhite observed, some of the sound is also poorly post-synced, but I'm convinced this is inherent in the original - the camera choreography is so spectacular at times that there's every likelihood that VláÄ
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
-
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:55 pm
- thirtyframesasecond
- Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 1:48 pm
I went to the Curzon Mayfair screening yesterday. Great introduction by Peter Hames, whose book on the Czech New Wave I really should purchase. It's interesting to hear that the source novel is a really unique piece of work in terms of narrative and so on, because the film really echoes that - it's pretty unconventional. I'm quite glad of the title cards before each segment because I think I'd have been lost at times. Certainly a terrific piece of film making, and it's great that Second Run and the Czech centre have invested so much time and effort into this project because as Hames said, this was only the THIRD screening of this film ever in London.
- MichaelB
- Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
- Location: Worthing
- Contact:
Indeed you should - few film books are truly definitive, but I'm hard pushed to think of any other English-language publication about Czech cinema that comes anywhere close to its scope (which is much wider than just the New Wave itself - he also gives a pretty decent overview of Czech film history as a whole).thirtyframesasecond wrote:Great introduction by Peter Hames, whose book on the Czech New Wave I really should purchase.
- Gregory
- Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm
Strange goings-on with the release date: I preordered it weeks ago at Amazon UK. Today I got an email saying the "release date was changed by the supplier" and that the new estimated arrival date is "03/12/07 - 06/12/07". On the Amazon site they still list the release date as Nov. 26.
EDIT: Their latest e-mail now says Dec 27 - Jan 11.
EDIT: Their latest e-mail now says Dec 27 - Jan 11.
Last edited by Gregory on Mon Nov 19, 2007 1:10 am, edited 1 time in total.