52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 1951-56

Discuss releases by Eureka and Masters of Cinema and the films on them.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#451 Post by Gregory » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:00 pm

Contrary to popular belief, the higher numbers are really better than the low ones. (It's no more self-evident one way than the other.)

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#452 Post by domino harvey » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:01 pm

Numbers divisible by seven are luckiest, though, that much is certain

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#453 Post by swo17 » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:04 pm

I'm mostly just jealous that domino somehow got mail today.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#454 Post by domino harvey » Mon Nov 11, 2013 3:10 pm

It was delivered by a veteran who thanked me for my service

Zot!
Joined: Wed Jan 20, 2010 12:09 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#455 Post by Zot! » Mon Nov 11, 2013 7:29 pm

#664 from Amazon in a crap packing job. Only two away from the only one I was secretly hoping for.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#456 Post by Michael Kerpan » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:28 pm

Prime numbers are best.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#457 Post by knives » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:30 pm

I thought irrational ones were.

User avatar
Michael Kerpan
Spelling Bee Champeen
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#458 Post by Michael Kerpan » Mon Nov 11, 2013 10:33 pm

knives wrote:I thought irrational ones were.
But MOC didn't hand out any with such numbers. They leave irrationality to us. ;~}

Jack Phillips
Joined: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:33 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#459 Post by Jack Phillips » Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:30 pm

I'm disappointed they didn't keep the reversible covers for this set. I guess I'll be keeping the DVDs after all.

User avatar
jsteffe
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:00 am
Location: Atlanta, GA

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#460 Post by jsteffe » Tue Nov 12, 2013 1:40 pm

david hare wrote:Mine's in at Number 420.
Lucky you!

User avatar
scubadonc
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 1:51 am
Location: Wyoming
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#461 Post by scubadonc » Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:29 pm

My amazon shipment arrived in Wyoming. The box was mangled but only minor scuffs to an upper corner. #614. Can't wait to watch these. Ugetsu is the only Mizoguchi movie I've ever seen.

Kauno
Joined: Sun Dec 18, 2011 4:01 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#462 Post by Kauno » Tue Nov 12, 2013 4:43 pm

Arrived from Eureka with one rather blonde and long pubic hair. The box set is great and the hair is long, so I don't think of the number at all.

User avatar
chatterjees
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:08 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#463 Post by chatterjees » Tue Nov 12, 2013 11:42 pm

My box arrived in Pittsburgh via amazon, intact. It feels like I could have almost missed it. Got #1756. Received a second package from amazon containing Arrow's The Fury, which got brutally damaged. Now, where can I get a replacement case for that?

User avatar
tenia
Ask Me About My Bassoon
Joined: Wed Apr 29, 2009 11:13 am

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#464 Post by tenia » Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:02 am

chatterjees wrote:Received a second package from amazon containing Arrow's The Fury, which got brutally damaged. Now, where can I get a replacement case for that?
The easiest would be probably from Amazon themselves. You email them about the problem (see the page "Help" at the bottom of the main page, then the yellow button "Contact us" on the right), explain it's badly damaged, and ask for a replacement. Depending where you're located, they might ask you to send back the damaged copy.

User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:48 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#465 Post by Oedipax » Wed Nov 13, 2013 2:30 am

Still no luck with my Eureka order. There's always tomorrow...

User avatar
chatterjees
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 6:08 pm
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#466 Post by chatterjees » Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:51 am

tenia wrote:
chatterjees wrote:Received a second package from amazon containing Arrow's The Fury, which got brutally damaged. Now, where can I get a replacement case for that?
The easiest would be probably from Amazon themselves. You email them about the problem (see the page "Help" at the bottom of the main page, then the yellow button "Contact us" on the right), explain it's badly damaged, and ask for a replacement. Depending where you're located, they might ask you to send back the damaged copy.
I contacted them last night and they placed a replacement order for me.

User avatar
Oedipax
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 8:48 am
Location: Atlanta

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#467 Post by Oedipax » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:15 pm

Oedipax wrote:Still no luck with my Eureka order. There's always tomorrow...
Happy ending: received #11/2000 today :D

Pristine condition as well, packed in a box within a box.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#468 Post by domino harvey » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:22 pm

11, 13, and 14 all went to boardmembers-- I hope someone owns up to 12 before the collectionistas have a conniption fit!

User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#469 Post by cdnchris » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:24 pm

Box was pretty much smashed when I got it but other than a slight dent in the corner the actual set is fine. Impressive looking set. Heavy, too.

559 btw.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#470 Post by swo17 » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:30 pm

domino harvey wrote:11, 13, and 14 all went to boardmembers-- I hope someone owns up to 12 before the collectionistas have a conniption fit!
Why has no one created a master list of who got which numbers? And then there should be a vote for who has the best number. And then we should all start writing posts exclusively using our number key pads. Example:
Oedipax wrote:86851365646841551 5668156 5641 561651?
domino harvey wrote:1351351! Image
cdnchris wrote:569688165164 684 684646.

User avatar
AlexHansen
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2008 10:39 pm
Location: Idaho

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#471 Post by AlexHansen » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:34 pm

Finally swo is given the opportunity to unleash his numerical-based writing system upon the world! Don't try to pretend you haven't been secretly working on that for years.

User avatar
jindianajonz
Jindiana Jonz Abrams
Joined: Wed Oct 12, 2011 8:11 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#472 Post by jindianajonz » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:42 pm

swo17 wrote:
domino harvey wrote:11, 13, and 14 all went to boardmembers-- I hope someone owns up to 12 before the collectionistas have a conniption fit!
Why has no one created a master list of who got which numbers? And then there should be a vote for who has the best number. And then we should all start writing posts exclusively using our number key pads. Example:
Oedipax wrote:86851365646841551 5668156 5641 561651?
domino harvey wrote:1351351! Image
cdnchris wrote:569688165164 684 684646.
492063616e742062656c6965766520796f7520746f6f6b207468652074696d6520746f20726561642074686973

User avatar
Gregory
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#473 Post by Gregory » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:48 pm

Mine just showed up in a flimsy DHL Global Mail cardboard envelope (ordered from Amazon) torn completely open so that the set could fall right out, but thankfully it was still inside.
I got one of the worst numbers of anyone so far: 576—not especially high or low, not prime, not associated with pot culture.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#474 Post by domino harvey » Wed Nov 13, 2013 7:50 pm

I like it because it's almost 976. And it's divisible by nine. So cheer up!

User avatar
feihong
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 12:20 pm

Re: 52-59 / BD 36-37, 71-72 Late Mizoguchi: Eight Films, 195

#475 Post by feihong » Wed Nov 13, 2013 8:28 pm

david hare wrote:Mine's in at Number 420.
We actually seem to have the same number, then. I've got a 420 I received from Eureka. Is that a printing duplication?

Post Reply