120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

Discuss releases by Eureka and Masters of Cinema and the films on them.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
NABOB OF NOWHERE
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2005 12:30 pm
Location: Brandywine River

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#126 Post by NABOB OF NOWHERE » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:45 am

HJackson wrote:
MichaelB wrote:I can't fathom how someone could regard a one-hour documentary and a 56-page booklet as short change.

Especially given the length of the main feature (or rather features).
I think Minkin would be happy with an hour long documentary if it was about the film and its content rather than the restoration effort. I'm not that concerned about extras personally (I'll watch them, but it's never make-or-break and they just seem like a bonus rather than a necessity), but I don't think a long video about restoring the film is of much interest to lots of people.
I would have thought that the chaps at MoC wouldn't give us an hour long mix of lab technicians in white coats scrubbing nitrate stock interspersed with self congratulatory talking heads but I have been wrong before.
Maybe the different provenance of the elements and the story of how it was all pieced together might be as epic as the film itself?

User avatar
Jean-Luc Garbo
Joined: Thu Dec 09, 2004 1:55 am
Contact:

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#127 Post by Jean-Luc Garbo » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:52 am

MichaelB wrote:I can't fathom how someone could regard a one-hour documentary and a 56-page booklet as short change.

Especially given the length of the main feature (or rather features).
Since we can't have a Kalat commentary on everything Lang from MOC, these features sound promising especially as I've been disappointed rarely by the booklets.

User avatar
MichaelB
Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Contact:

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#128 Post by MichaelB » Tue Jul 17, 2012 10:53 am

NABOB OF NOWHERE wrote:I would have thought that the chaps at MoC wouldn't give us an hour long mix of lab technicians in white coats scrubbing nitrate stock interspersed with self congratulatory talking heads but I have been wrong before.
Yes, I'd be very surprised if it was exclusively about the restoration. I suspect it's more likely to be one of those combined pieces that deals with the film in depth before discussing the restoration quite briefly towards the end.

User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#129 Post by Tommaso » Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:04 pm

If it's the film called "Das Erbe der Nibelungen" which they showed on TV together with the broadcast of the resto, then it's a general documentary on "Die Nibelungen" and its influence on silent filmmaking in Germany in the 20s. Of course there's something on the new resto as well, but certainly not exclusively. The running time of 60 minutes makes me strongly suspect it will be that documentary. And it's a good one.

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#130 Post by HerrSchreck » Tue Jul 17, 2012 12:20 pm

Tommaso wrote:there were tantalising excerpts from the unreleased resto of Gerlach's "Grieshuus"...
Whomever is first out of the gate with THIS film is formally, completely and totally my hero.

The cojones-meter has just started to whir . . . . I hope to hear it beep someday.

User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#131 Post by denti alligator » Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:08 pm

So glad to see Schreck and Tommaso continuing to push for the great, forgotten German silents!

Bravo! Won't the Filmmuseum people tackle that one?

User avatar
TMDaines
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:01 pm
Location: Stretford, Manchester

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#132 Post by TMDaines » Tue Jul 17, 2012 1:23 pm

Tommaso wrote:If it's the film called "Das Erbe der Nibelungen" which they showed on TV together with the broadcast of the resto, then it's a general documentary on "Die Nibelungen" and its influence on silent filmmaking in Germany in the 20s. Of course there's something on the new resto as well, but certainly not exclusively. The running time of 60 minutes makes me strongly suspect it will be that documentary. And it's a good one.
Well, that sounds good! Hope that is the one here.

User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#133 Post by Tommaso » Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:01 pm

denti alligator wrote:So glad to see Schreck and Tommaso continuing to push for the great, forgotten German silents!
Always at your service ;) And good to see you back in action here, denti.

Filmmuseum most likely won't release the Gerlach as it's UFA material, owned by FWMS, and these people are sitting on their gems and won't give them into other hands but Transit's (from where these films get licensed to the rest of the world, if you're lucky). And in addition, with "Grieshuus" they're waiting for someone to find funds for the re-orchestration of the original score, which only survives as a piano reduction, which they say they don't want to use.... Don't expect it before 2020, I'd say.

However, there'll be new broadcasts of "Mutter Krausens Fahrt ins Glück" (Jutzi) and "Die Weber" (Zelnik) this year on arte TV. At least something.

User avatar
denti alligator
Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:36 pm
Location: "born in heaven, raised in hell"

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#134 Post by denti alligator » Tue Jul 17, 2012 2:37 pm

Tommaso wrote:However, there'll be new broadcasts of "Mutter Krausens Fahrt ins Glück" (Jutzi) and "Die Weber" (Zelnik) this year on arte TV. At least something.
Be still my heart!

Will have to find my way back to a certain other online enclave...

User avatar
Minkin
Joined: Thu Aug 06, 2009 11:13 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#135 Post by Minkin » Tue Jul 17, 2012 6:04 pm

I guess I'm glad I didn't give a fiery response to people. Best to be silent first - then others can step in and defend you. Though I must respond to MichaelB (the 'can't fathom' comment), by directing him towards the Rosemary's Baby thread, or most every other recent Criterion thread.

I'll also say that I'm not a packaging fetishist (I think you failed to read my words correctly, Bürgermeister. That's a bit of a rude notion on your part) and am perfectly happy with the cover and lack of Tshirt and Poster, though it really does seem odd to have Testament (as good as it may be) get a better special treatment than Nibelung. It seems like a perfect opportunity to give some classy packaging - and I'd gladly pay whatever price for it. Just throw Siegfried and Kriemhild sharing a water bowel, and it'd be great. I guess I'm trying to make the case - so that MOC reconsider passing over this one. Yeah, that didn't help my non-packaging-fetishist argument (especially since I've bought all the MOC Steelbooks), but I nary think I'm the only one who thinks it odd that MOC didn't at least treat this better than Testament
Tommaso wrote:If it's the film called "Das Erbe der Nibelungen" which they showed on TV together with the broadcast of the resto, then it's a general documentary on "Die Nibelungen" and its influence on silent filmmaking in Germany in the 20s. Of course there's something on the new resto as well, but certainly not exclusively. The running time of 60 minutes makes me strongly suspect it will be that documentary. And it's a good one.
I suppose I should learn what exactly is involved with the documentary before I denounce it. Usually, "restoration demonstration" are not words to get your heart pumping (one can only sit through so many times at the wet gate). I knew it must have been something more than that if it were an hour - but I am still curious as to how in depth it goes. Typically, a Kalat commentary would come in for the rescue, and it's a shame that he 'retired' before getting to Nibelung. Perhaps it's because my professor is such an expert on the films and source that I feel rather spoiled. I can see if I can get him out of the woodwork to do some commentary or other supplement. Yeah, I know what you think, boring professor, but he's quite the personality. There's quite a bit to cover, that I would think would be glossed over or absent from a general documentary (the restoration one) - though, to be fair, I haven't seen this documentary. Tommaso, how in depth does it go - say with - the source material? the Nazi connection? Wagner connection? etc.

I guess I'll lastly explain why I'm so crazed about the Gaylord Carter score. I suppose there's my appreciation for his organ scores -which are too often dropped from new releases of silent films. There's also my appreciation for his great talent and for what he did for silent films - giving them new life so that we could appreciate them - rather than tossing Toccata or Grieg onto a silent film. He has also been completely unappreciated for his contributions - which is quite sad. Lastly, and most easily to rationalize everything - I have a rather personal story with the score and this film. I met my S.O. thanks to this film and its' Carter score. Having both attended the same screening, we met randomly elsewhere and recognized each other - and both held the film in great esteem. So, we routinely make reference to the score (typically the Attila encampment song) and opening - which have both remained so iconic. So the film and the Carter score are quite personal to me, thus explaining my crazed attempts to constantly push this score for its' release (and no, we're not renaissance fair people). I know one sappy story isn't enough to add a score to a film (unless you want me to get engaged in some creative way while using the score or use it for a wedding march - just as long as Tommaso doesn't appear randomly and toss a spear at me). If you want better justification, then you can use the Carter score to better connect the film to Wagner and that interpretation of the story and film. I don't believe any new footage has been discovered since, so I would assume that the score would at least be easily added (unless it was composed for a different frame rate - which I don't think is the case either). And yes, MOC hasn't made any announcement either way about the score (yeah, the Huppertz is a given, but I would have thought any additional score would have been mentioned at this point- as is the case for Jeanne). So hopefully that explains my great passion and fervor for that plucky organ score.

So, sorry if it appeared I was overly critical of MOC and this release. I've been waiting several years for this (getting by on an old VHS copy while in anticipation)- so I was bound to be disappointed by anything less than a 10 disc set with a packaged book of the original German & English Nibelungenlied text. This is certainly the release of the decade for me, so don't think that I'm unappreciative of the film or seeing the new restoration.
I just feel that there's some things missing from this release that could/should be present (even some of the Kino extras would have been welcome). I'll still push for the Carter score until I hear a definitive no from MOC, then I'll probably bug Kino to death about it, then perhaps the Germans. Sorry if my ramblings annoyed y'all and thanks TMDaines for defending me. This is probably my favorite film - so I feel justified in seeming overly insane when referring to it.

So hopefully that clears that matter somewhat.


Edit-

Also to be noted, I just discovered this on the Amazon UK page, and it states that more extras are to follow:
Amazon UK Page wrote:SPECIAL FEATURES:
Long-awaited expert HD restoration by the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung, Germany
Immaculately presented in the film's original frame rates and aspect ratio, in 1080p on the Blu-ray
Newly translated optional English subtitles for the original German intertitles
An hour-long documentary: The Heritage of Die Nibelungen
Illustrated booklet featuring the words of Lang, rare archival imagery, and more
Further details to be announced nearer the release date!

User avatar
Drucker
Your Future our Drucker
Joined: Wed May 18, 2011 9:37 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#136 Post by Drucker » Tue Jul 17, 2012 7:24 pm

Minkin wrote:Edit-

Also to be noted, I just discovered this on the Amazon UK page, and it states that more extras are to follow:
Amazon UK Page wrote:SPECIAL FEATURES:
Long-awaited expert HD restoration by the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung, Germany
Immaculately presented in the film's original frame rates and aspect ratio, in 1080p on the Blu-ray
Newly translated optional English subtitles for the original German intertitles
An hour-long documentary: The Heritage of Die Nibelungen
Illustrated booklet featuring the words of Lang, rare archival imagery, and more
Further details to be announced nearer the release date!
It doesn't say that on MOC's page but it does say it elsewhere, like for the Ozu release.

User avatar
Tommaso
Joined: Fri May 19, 2006 10:09 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#137 Post by Tommaso » Wed Jul 18, 2012 1:08 am

Minkin wrote: I haven't seen this documentary. Tommaso, how in depth does it go - say with - the source material? the Nazi connection? Wagner connection? etc.
Good to see (as confirmed via amazon) it's indeed the documentary I mentioned. It's pretty all-inclusive: some bits about the Nibelungenlied, the nazi connection, other films like "Grieshuus" and "Der Turm des Schweigens"; then of course also comparisons between various prints, restoration history, the original score and its new recording. The length of the film as shown on TV was about 70 min.; as MoC speak of an 'hour-long' documentary I only hope that nothing was cut out, especially not the excerpts from other films.
Long-awaited expert HD restoration by the Friedrich-Wilhelm-Murnau-Stiftung, Germany
I guess the real discussions will begin once people make up their mind about this "expert" restoration. For instance about the tinting, or the fact that they chose to have the films run at different speeds: 20 fps for "Siegfried", 22 fps for "Kriemhild", and all because of the music 'requiring' such speed-up of the second film (doesn't that sound familiar from "Metropolis"?) There are also shots in the old version which are NOT in the new resto. This "Nibelungen"-version may be seen as rather controversial in some respects...

User avatar
Sloper
Joined: Tue May 29, 2007 10:06 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#138 Post by Sloper » Wed Jul 18, 2012 3:19 am

Minkin, I think Carter is under-appreciated as well. It's not hard to see why, as his instrument can't help but sound old-fashioned, but if you listen with a sympathetic ear his scores are wonderful, and as you say - wonderfully authentic. I'm sure there would be all sorts of problems with releasing his score on this edition, but it would be nice to have it.

I've been really getting into Wagner lately, especially the Ring Cycle, spurred partly by my love of this film; I keep meaning to read my copy of the Nibelungenlied as well. Perhaps now that this is finally coming out I'll get around to it.

evillights
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: U.S.
Contact:

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#139 Post by evillights » Wed Jul 18, 2012 4:29 pm

Minkin wrote:though it really does seem odd to have Testament (as good as it may be) get a better special treatment than Nibelung. It seems like a perfect opportunity to give some classy packaging - and I'd gladly pay whatever price for it. Just throw Siegfried and Kriemhild sharing a water bowel, and it'd be great. I guess I'm trying to make the case - so that MOC reconsider passing over this one. Yeah, that didn't help my non-packaging-fetishist argument (especially since I've bought all the MOC Steelbooks), but I nary think I'm the only one who thinks it odd that MOC didn't at least treat this better than Testament
This is an epic ramble. We're treating Testament "better" than Die Nibelungen, on the basis of there being no SteelBook? Well, we would have had to include four discs in the SteelBook edition, and it's not logistically, not physically, possible. Rest assured, we will do our best to throw Siegfried and Kriemhild sharing a water bowel.
Minkin wrote:I guess I'll lastly explain why I'm so crazed about the Gaylord Carter score. [...] I don't believe any new footage has been discovered since, so I would assume that the score would at least be easily added [...] So hopefully that explains my great passion and fervor for that plucky organ score.
When you watch the documentary, you'll get a sense of why a previously recorded score may not just automatically fit on top of a new restoration.

This would be an extreme example, but just so folks might better understand the issue in the abstract: "Film X is presented in a new 2012 restoration, which integrates [or which removes] 30 minutes of footage previously considered lost [or considered undesired by the director for his final cut]." — cut to Internet: "If they don't include the Carl Davis score from 1982 I am going to rage all over the forums."
Minkin wrote:So, sorry if it appeared I was overly critical of MOC and this release. [...] I'll still push for the Carter score until I hear a definitive no from MOC, then I'll probably bug Kino to death about it, then perhaps the Germans.
Oh, brother. Someone send Kino and the Germans fair warning, would you?
Minkin wrote:I feel justified in seeming overly insane when referring to it.
Certainly — the Internet was put on this earth for people to rant anonymously about whatever they want and criticize to their hearts' content, in a way they never would sitting across the table face-to-face with the target of their criticism, all while not understanding details and circumstances that might be involved in the matter at hand. It is very, very important that you feel justified.

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#140 Post by HerrSchreck » Wed Jul 18, 2012 4:36 pm

Rest assured, we will do our best to throw Siegfried and Kriemhild sharing a water bowel.
Dude . . . I just spit this purple hibiscus iced tea my boss just had me try across the keyboard.

I almost lost control of my water bowels.

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#141 Post by zedz » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:17 pm

I demand a miniature gigantic tree!
Image

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#142 Post by Jeff » Wed Jul 18, 2012 8:37 pm

I don't really see anything wrong with Minkin questioning what currently appears, on paper, to be relatively sparse supplements. We've all certainly done the same in the Rosemary's Baby thread and others. While I personally think that a lengthy documentary and what is sure to be another excellent MoC book are probably more than adequate accompaniments to such an epic-length film, it's hardly unheard of to expect a definitive set of audio and video supplements on a long-awaited major release. I've no doubt that MoC will give us another indispensable package, but I don't see any reason why people should avoid voicing disappointment in a reasonable manner just because MoC staff post here. If anything, it's nice that they can chime in to assuage our concerns.

User avatar
HerrSchreck
Joined: Sun Sep 04, 2005 11:46 am

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#143 Post by HerrSchreck » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:13 pm

So we won't be creating a WHY DON'T THEY RELEASE ONLY THE EXTRAS THAT I WANT subfoum?

... And the ROSEMARY'S thread had people getting snippy, too, towards those that durst complain.

Seriously, and in Craig's defense, I think its less that the guy complained, but did so in Martian prose of grinding angst and novella length.

User avatar
Jeff
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:49 pm
Location: Denver, CO

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#144 Post by Jeff » Wed Jul 18, 2012 9:48 pm

HerrSchreck wrote:So we won't be creating a WHY DON'T THEY RELEASE ONLY THE EXTRAS THAT I WANT subfoum?

... And the ROSEMARY'S thread had people getting snippy, too, towards those that durst complain.
To be clear, I don't think there's anything wrong at all with the minimalist supplement route. Lord knows I've bought my share of pricey, featureless Twilight Time discs. There's certainly no doubt I'll buy Die Nibelungen too. I do, however, think that when Criterion and Masters of Cinema appear go that route on a major title, it's just sort of surprising, and natural for people to at least question it -- the way you, and I, and zedz, and others did in the Rosemary's Baby thread. Other people disagreed with us, but at least nobody implied we had no right to criticize or question Criterion's decisions. I already know that I can't fathom the massive amount of effort that goes into a Criterion or Masters of Cinema release, and I always trust that they're putting out the best packages they possibly can. Despite that, I know that I, for one, am not going to censor my reaction when they occasionally surprise me with their decisions, and I can't imagine that you would either.
HerrSchreck wrote:I think its less that the guy complained, but did so in Martian prose of grinding angst and novella length.
I read it as taking issue with the content, more than the form of Minkin's post, but okay.

evillights
Joined: Mon Nov 15, 2004 2:47 pm
Location: U.S.
Contact:

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#145 Post by evillights » Wed Jul 18, 2012 10:18 pm

HerrSchreck wrote:So we won't be creating a WHY DON'T THEY RELEASE ONLY THE EXTRAS THAT I WANT subfoum?

... And the ROSEMARY'S thread had people getting snippy, too, towards those that durst complain.

Seriously, and in Craig's defense, I think its less that the guy complained, but did so in Martian prose of grinding angst and novella length.
Thanks, Schreck. And to clarify, I meant no personal offense — it's just, every now and then, y'know, let there be some proportion, if not in the degree of expectations fulfilled or disappointed, but in how it's expressed. So, basically: all-of-what-you-said. Since you mention Rosemary/Wells, tangentially, I'd observe that that's a perfect example of some of the, shall we say, more hyperbolic and vituperative aspects of forums, blogs, etc., which have circulated in full-force over the last few days on different Internet platforms... especially in concert with this entire Rotten Tomatoes / Dark Knight Rises business, which kind of resides in this quantum zone of both-comic-and-disturbing. (But that's something with entirely different implications, though I'd point to earlier portions of the Tiny Furniture thread to locate a comparable aggression.) Quelle époque...

Anyway, back to the film — and since Batman came up — Jonathan Rosenbaum has on multiple occasions expressed the opinion that Die Nibelungen is a prime influence on Batman. I've never quite seen it, but could be.

Last note about on-disc supplements: Kalat was the one we thought would be the ringer for an erudite, and compelling-throughout-five-hours contribution; he wasn't available, though, and from our perspective, for this film in particular, it wasn't so much a matter of including a commentary for the sake of it, as the desire to include a Kalat-Commentary. Hopefully at some point in the future he'll do some more — they're pretty great. That being said, the documentary is a very worthwhile piece — but, obviously, we look at our booklets as every-bit-as-important as whatever is on the disc, and it's a medium that allows even greater curatorial gusto, maybe. And this release will have a very good booklet. Only today, we secured a piece for inclusion that I wasn't even aware of existing until two days ago, and which is incredibly beautiful, and might be considered by some to be worth more than any number of more standard commentaries, or video introductions. (Not to take anything away from either form — when they're good, they're good.)

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#146 Post by zedz » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:10 am

evillights wrote:from our perspective, for this film in particular, it wasn't so much a matter of including a commentary for the sake of it, as the desire to include a Kalat-Commentary.
This makes perfect sense. A five-hour commentary in almost every other instance would be a terrible idea, likely as punishing for the commentator as for the listener, but a five-hour Kalat commentary is one I'd be itching to hear.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#147 Post by matrixschmatrix » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:32 am

I wouldn't mind a five hour Rosenbaum commentary, but it really is a shame that Kalat retired- this is the kind of project that is custom designed for him. I'll happily buy it anyway, but I'd be counting the days if he was going to be on it.

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#148 Post by swo17 » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:38 am

Hire HerrSchreck to do one! (I'm not joking.)

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#149 Post by knives » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:40 am

I would really love to hear that actually. I'm not sure if he has as smooth a delivery as Kalat, but he's as jacksmart and knowledgeable. Should be entertaining too.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: 120 / BD 46 Die Nibelungen

#150 Post by matrixschmatrix » Thu Jul 19, 2012 12:42 am

Obviously we're a bit late on this, but they also could have done what Criterion did on Seven Samurai and Children of Paradise and divided the commentary duties up between a couple of different people.

I wonder if would could start a Kickstarter to get Kalat to release a commentary on mp3 or something. The idea of what could have been is just haunting, dammit.

Post Reply