Lionsgate

Vinegar Syndrome, Deaf Crocodile, Imprint, Cinema Guild, and more.
Post Reply
Message
Author
User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: Lionsgate

#276 Post by cdnchris » Thu Oct 13, 2011 1:56 pm

It does look to be severely boosted to me in some scenes and there's been some processing. It was a little annoying and I suspect an attempt to make it look more "HD" but I could live with that aspect. What I found distracting, though, was the constant strobing of quickly moving objects, which is something I'd expect from an interlaced transfer. Doing screen grabs you can see the trailing fairly distinctly. Jackie Brown's the same and everyone looks very orange in that one, something I don't recall when I saw it in the theater (though it was years ago.) I'm actually very disappointed with both of these discs, even if they are, yes, still the best way I've seen them on home video. Could still be a lot better.

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Lionsgate

#277 Post by hearthesilence » Thu Oct 13, 2011 4:45 pm

Yeah, I think you're right about that weird crap going on with anything that's moving. Goddammit Lionsgate, did you have to fuck this up too?

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Lionsgate

#278 Post by hearthesilence » Fri Oct 14, 2011 12:33 pm

FWIW, the Panorama Blu-Ray may have pitch issues. The soundtrack is at a higher pitch than the Lionsgate Blu-Ray.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#279 Post by domino harvey » Sat Oct 15, 2011 9:13 am

Good news if you're a teenage girl: She's All That and Serendipity are getting Blu releases January 3

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: Lionsgate

#280 Post by manicsounds » Mon Nov 07, 2011 10:29 am

Coppola's "One From The Heart" seems to have gotten rereleased by Lionsgate earlier this year, but is this the same in content from the previous release?

Some etailers say 1-disc, some say 2-disc. Can't find any images of back covers either. Anyone know?

User avatar
captveg
Joined: Wed Sep 02, 2009 7:28 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#281 Post by captveg » Tue Nov 08, 2011 6:59 pm

Looks like a wave of Miramax award winners are coming out January 31st:

Cold Mountain
The English Patient
Frida
The Piano
Shakespeare in Love

http://www.dvdaf.com/releases.html?week ... rm=med_0_B" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Lionsgate

#282 Post by Brian C » Tue Nov 08, 2011 7:25 pm

Hey now, that's great news. Been waiting for The Piano especially since forever. I don't think it ever even got a 16x9 release here in the US...?

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: Lionsgate

#283 Post by manicsounds » Tue Nov 08, 2011 9:20 pm

Was hoping for The Piano Criterion... oh well.

User avatar
mfunk9786
Under Chris' Protection
Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA

Re: Lionsgate

#284 Post by mfunk9786 » Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:04 am

Jack White vomiting in HD!

User avatar
hearthesilence
Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC

Re: Lionsgate

#285 Post by hearthesilence » Wed Nov 09, 2011 12:50 am

Brian C wrote:Hey now, that's great news. Been waiting for The Piano especially since forever. I don't think it ever even got a 16x9 release here in the US...?
No, it never did. I haven't seen Portrait of a Lady yet (which did draw its share of high praise), but otherwise, this was the last one she did that I really liked.

User avatar
dwk
Joined: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:10 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#286 Post by dwk » Thu Nov 10, 2011 4:27 am


User avatar
dadaistnun
Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:31 am

Re: Lionsgate

#287 Post by dadaistnun » Wed Dec 07, 2011 9:55 am

Lionsgate is starting their own MOD line. The press release mentions Brighton Rock, so does that mean Criterion doesn't have it, despite the Rialto re-release?

In the comments on the HTF thread, someone mentions a Lionsgate DVD-R listing at Amazon for Went the Day Well, another Rialto title.

User avatar
domino harvey
Dot Com Dom
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#288 Post by domino harvey » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:21 am

I hate this world

User avatar
triodelover
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: The hills of East Tennessee

Re: Lionsgate

#289 Post by triodelover » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:30 am

dadaistnun wrote:Lionsgate is starting their own MOD line. The press release mentions Brighton Rock, so does that mean Criterion doesn't have it, despite the Rialto re-release?

In the comments on the HTF thread, someone mentions a Lionsgate DVD-R listing at Amazon for Went the Day Well, another Rialto title.
Both of those films are available in excellent Blu-ray transfers from UK Studio Canal. Went the Day Well also includes Calvalcanti's short send-up/attack on Mussolini, Yellow Caesar. Both are Region B locked, however.

User avatar
jwd5275
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2010 12:26 pm
Location: SF, CA

Re: Lionsgate

#290 Post by jwd5275 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 12:23 pm

dadaistnun wrote:Lionsgate is starting their own MOD line. The press release mentions Brighton Rock, so does that mean Criterion doesn't have it, despite the Rialto re-release?

In the comments on the HTF thread, someone mentions a Lionsgate DVD-R listing at Amazon for Went the Day Well, another Rialto title.
A huge portion of the Rialto catalog including most of those that remain unreleased by Criterion are StudioCanal titles. I gave up my deep seated hope for Brighton Rock when I realized that (at least until something changes in that situation).

An absolute shame that these titles, in addition to receiving the typical Lionsgate treatment, they have to suffer the additional indignity of MOD...

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#291 Post by knives » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:26 pm

Image

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: Lionsgate

#292 Post by swo17 » Wed Dec 07, 2011 5:27 pm

Breathable air is honestly the only thing keeping me here at this point.

User avatar
vsski
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#293 Post by vsski » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:02 pm

So UK Studio Canal has both films in excellent Blu Ray transfers (Region locked, but still) and Lionsgate dumps them on MOD DVDs in the US.
Is there really less of a collector's market in the US for titles like these than there is in Europe or do US companies calculate profits differently - what am I missing?

Maybe I should just trade in my DVD and BR collection for a ticket on the next space ship to Mars - arghh!

User avatar
zedz
Joined: Sun Nov 07, 2004 7:24 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#294 Post by zedz » Wed Dec 07, 2011 10:48 pm

I believe that a region-free BluRay player is still cheaper than a ticket to Mars, and the Blu of Went the Day Well? is an excellent excuse to take that plunge.

User avatar
vsski
Joined: Thu Oct 13, 2011 3:47 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#295 Post by vsski » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:31 am

Zedz - fully agree and I actually own a region free Blu Ray Player and these days before buying any BR I always check both sides of the Atlantic for available versions not just in terms of quality but also extras, so even if Lionsgate would have published these movies on BR in the US, I would carefully read reviews first before buying, especially given their track record.

However, my main question that I really don't have a good answer for is why has MOD taken off for classical titles in the US, while in Europe some of these titles can be bought in regular pressed versions?
Is it that the studios think there aren't enough US consumers interested in buying these titles to make it worthwhile, is it that the US collectors market is less discerning, is it that profit thresholds are different for studios to put some money behind a pressed release or is it that enough collectors buy the MOD versions, which seem more profitable for the studios anyhow, that studios decide why go through the additional investment with pressed releases if the same money or more can be had with MOD titles?

User avatar
Brian C
I hate to be That Pedantic Guy but...
Joined: Wed Sep 16, 2009 11:58 am
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Lionsgate

#296 Post by Brian C » Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:34 am

But you know what was really awesome? When StudioCanal took their licenses away from Criterion so that Lionsgate could MOD them.
vsski wrote:Is it that the studios think there aren't enough US consumers interested in buying these titles to make it worthwhile, is it that the US collectors market is less discerning, is it that profit thresholds are different for studios to put some money behind a pressed release or is it that enough collectors buy the MOD versions, which seem more profitable for the studios anyhow, that studios decide why go through the additional investment with pressed releases if the same money or more can be had with MOD titles?
My uninformed sense of the situation is that many corporations these days, especially in the US, are not satisfied with "profit". Something is not worth doing unless it generates "massive profit". As a result, companies like Criterion - and even smaller entities like Kino or Oscilloscope or what have you - are able to stay afloat while putting out extravagant releases of titles the big studios would never even dream of considering, while the studios give the big "fuck you" to considerably more prominent titles that they control.

I guess it's possible that the economics of the situation work out for Criterion (and others) but not the studios. But I have a hard time imagining how that could be. To me, it looks like a massive market inefficiency, but what do I know.

User avatar
TMDaines
Joined: Wed Nov 11, 2009 1:01 pm
Location: Stretford, Manchester

Re: Lionsgate

#297 Post by TMDaines » Thu Dec 08, 2011 9:39 am

vsski wrote:However, my main question that I really don't have a good answer for is why has MOD taken off for classical titles in the US, while in Europe some of these titles can be bought in regular pressed versions?
Is it that the studios think there aren't enough US consumers interested in buying these titles to make it worthwhile, is it that the US collectors market is less discerning, is it that profit thresholds are different for studios to put some money behind a pressed release or is it that enough collectors buy the MOD versions, which seem more profitable for the studios anyhow, that studios decide why go through the additional investment with pressed releases if the same money or more can be had with MOD titles?
It's an interesting question, especially considering the US market is much bigger. I can't help but think sometimes that those in charge do see Americans as far less discerning. See pay-per-view: the number of PPVs in Britain is far, far less and the prices when the events on PPV are much, much lower. Sky are all but stopping PPV now. In most of Europe PPV doesn't exist at all. People over here simply aren't interested and won't buy it and the same goes for MOD titles. I'm literally flabbergasted at the prices Americans "have" to pay for UFC, Boxing and WWE PPVs. It's simply crazy.

User avatar
manicsounds
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 10:58 pm
Location: Tokyo, Japan

Re: Lionsgate

#298 Post by manicsounds » Thu Dec 08, 2011 10:40 am

TMDaines wrote:
vsski wrote:I'm literally flabbergasted at the prices Americans "have" to pay for UFC, Boxing and WWE PPVs. It's simply crazy.
I'm flabbergasted that people actually want that stuff...

This just shows that Lionsgate aren't really aware of what they have, and don't think these 'old British movies' would make an American Buck.

User avatar
triodelover
Joined: Sat Jan 27, 2007 2:11 pm
Location: The hills of East Tennessee

Re: Lionsgate

#299 Post by triodelover » Thu Dec 08, 2011 12:08 pm

manicsounds wrote:This just shows that Lionsgate aren't really aware of what they have, and don't think these 'old British movies' would make an American Buck.
Enough American bucks...Brian's correct.

But I think it's also true inn the US that the collector's market is an aging market. Whether its film or music, younger generations are simply not interested in owing the physical package. They are more interested in being able to load the product on one of a variety of mobile devices and "consuming" it in that fashion. Look at the success of the iTunes model. Consider the smart phone ads that tout the ability to watch movies on that tiny screen as a plus.

User avatar
matrixschmatrix
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 11:26 pm

Re: Lionsgate

#300 Post by matrixschmatrix » Thu Dec 08, 2011 1:56 pm

Bah, that tells us only what marketers wish to sell to young people, not necessarily what young people want to buy. I think the degree to which those two things fail to overlap is sort of the whole point at issue here.

Post Reply