I would say that of Van Sant's first three films, Mala Noche is far and away the best. Drugstore Cowboy is a fine but rather conventional slacker drama, redeemed to a great degree by the appearance of Burroughs in the third act. My Own Private Idaho is extremely interesting, but something of a mess -- and it has Keanu Reeves, which is a big point against it, and worse yet it has Keanu Reeves mangling Shakespeare. But Mala Noche is pretty much perfect, a masterpiece of desire and lust, economically told with some gorgeous cinematography and a real grasp of potent images.blindside8zao wrote:I'll probably end up getting this anyways, to see for myself, but, Drugstore Cowboy left me completely bored/unimpressed but Idaho completely wows me in every way (I even think that Reeves/Shakespeare completely works by creating a quirky feel to the entire film, as if you lived in a world of stilted Shakespearean actors, entirely artificial). Which side does Mala Noche lean on?
All three films are pretty different from each other, while at the same time clearly originating with the same creative mind. Nevertheless, I'd say Mala Noche is the clear predecessor of Van Sant's more recent films, starting with Gerry, and it has much more in common with the "death trilogy" than with anything in his other early films. Having seen this now, his career has taken on a very different shape for me. Before, I always thought of his first three films as a group, then the commercial period, and then a rebirth starting with Gerry. Now it looks more and more like everything between Mala Noche and Gerry represents a stylistic break, and the films he's making now are linking up with the aesthetic foundations he built in his first film.