It is currently Wed Apr 25, 2018 12:28 pm

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Jul 22, 2014 10:49 am 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 1:20 pm
Location: New England
Well -- it seemed intrusive and unnecessary (to all viewers in our family, not just the son who initially commented). I agree it is all too common -- but I tend to prefer movies that _don't_ do things of this sort.


Top
 Profile  
 

PostPosted: Mon May 16, 2016 1:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 04, 2005 4:22 am
Location: NYC
The production coordinator on this apparently wrote an article blasting Payne and his assistant director for their treatment of her.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:02 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Hong Chau confirms a Criterion release


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:17 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 11:27 pm
Just bought this the other day. You're welcome, everyone.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:21 pm
Professor Wagstaff wrote:
Just bought this the other day. You're welcome, everyone.


Please buy some Béla Tarr.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:45 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Enjoy the Criterion release of Belle Starr


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 7:52 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jul 12, 2007 9:21 pm
domino harvey wrote:
Enjoy the Criterion release of Belle Starr


I read the description of it. It seems... problematic.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 07, 2017 8:22 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
It's worse than that!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:18 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
Dec 12


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 5:22 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm
Passion of Martin is a nice little film so I'm glad they could get it as an extra though too bad Carmen seems MIA. I'm still morbidly curious about that porno he did though.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Fri Sep 15, 2017 6:09 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:04 pm
Location: Hants, UK
knives wrote:
Passion of Martin is a nice little film so I'm glad they could get it as an extra though too bad Carmen seems MIA. I'm still morbidly curious about that porno he did though.


Carmen is however on the Cinema16: American Short Films DVD, so not entirely unavailable for those interested (I have a copy of it in a box somewhere).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 3:24 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
First with Rushmore and now this, it's very cool that Criterion now has both of the films which sort of encapsulated my teenage experience, or at the very least the films that I gravitated to most at that time as something more reflective of my experiences than the glut of mainstream Hollywood teen movies being put out at the time.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 6:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 09, 2012 9:26 am
Location: Burlington, MA
swo17 wrote:
Highway 61 wrote:
I definitely felt Payne's contempt come through in About Schmidt, which is one of the most depressing movies I've ever seen. I felt hopeless and lethargic after watching it.

I had just started working as an actuary (and was not loving it) when I saw About Schmidt for the first time. And you thought you were depressed...

I've since come around to it though, and I think it's probably Payne's best film, though Election comes close.


Are you still working in insurance? From your tone, I'd guess you've moved on.

I'm asking because I was an actuary for 10 years and I left the field. I can sympathize with you 100%. It's brutal.

Regarding Election, does anyone think the cover is silly and childish?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 7:46 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri May 16, 2008 4:43 pm
Location: Philadelphia, PA
We have a cover art thread where that question would be right at home.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Re:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 16, 2017 8:31 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
cpetrizzi wrote:
Are you still working in insurance? From your tone, I'd guess you've moved on.

That was more just me feeling overwhelmed at my first big boy job. I've been there now for 15 years and would like to think I'm pretty good at it. Big difference: Schmidt was a company actuary. I am a consulting actuary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Thu Nov 09, 2017 5:03 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Beaver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Fri Nov 10, 2017 12:52 am 

Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 11:50 pm
Half those shots look like Election directed by David Fincher


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 11:52 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2005 3:31 pm
Location: Indiana
His bone to pick with the film's rating at the end is interesting to consider.

Quote:
One final observation about the rating, which is "R" "for strong sexuality, sex-related dialogue and language, and a scene of drug use." I don't get it. Never did. The rating seems politically and religiously motivated more than anything else. I'd give it PG-13 at most.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:24 pm
Location: Teegeeack
It's been a long time since I've seen this and I don't remember it that well, but just looking through an .srt caption file there's over a dozen uses of the word "fuck," which is way more than the MPAA allows at the PG-13 level. There's a good argument to be made that the ratings board is too strict about profanity (among many other things), but the R rating is consistent with their established practice.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sat Nov 11, 2017 9:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
Not to mention the described/imagined sex between teachers and students


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 5:24 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Mar 28, 2008 3:56 pm
Location: Aldershot, Hampshire, UK
The Fanciful Norwegian wrote:
It's been a long time since I've seen this and I don't remember it that well, but just looking through an .srt caption file there's over a dozen uses of the word "fuck," which is way more than the MPAA allows at the PG-13 level. There's a good argument to be made that the ratings board is too strict about profanity (among many other things), but the R rating is consistent with their established practice.


One use of "cunt" as well.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Sun Nov 12, 2017 11:38 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Aug 10, 2013 12:18 am
The Fanciful Norwegian wrote:
It's been a long time since I've seen this and I don't remember it that well, but just looking through an .srt caption file there's over a dozen uses of the word "fuck," which is way more than the MPAA allows at the PG-13 level. There's a good argument to be made that the ratings board is too strict about profanity (among many other things), but the R rating is consistent with their established practice.

PG-13 movies are allowed one uncensored use of "fuck". Two or more is an instant R rating, regardless of the film's actual content.
It was a point of contention several years ago when the documentary "Bully" received an R rating for repeated use of the word.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 12:20 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 4:07 pm
Yaanu wrote:
PG-13 movies are allowed one uncensored use of "fuck".

There were negotiations to increase this threshold slightly, but the MPAA did not give two fucks.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:13 am 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana
While not a myth per se the commonly accepted statement that "fuck" can only be used a few times isn't true. It all depends on how the board feels that day. Gunner Palace has forty two uses of fuck, two of which are used sexually. Because the MPAA doesn't have more specific rules out in the open like the BBFC we can only ascertain from what we can see which often leads to misinformation being spread. Because of this you can have wildy different reactions to films from the board.

The MPAA in my opinion either needs a complete reworking or needs to be replaced with something akin to the BBFC. Obviously they couldn't censor like the BBFC because of US laws but I don't think it would be difficult to add rules that allow for context rather than blind association. For example language spoken in anger is different than language used crudely. And non sexualized nudity is obviously different than sexualized nudity.

In the case of Election it's quite likely it's a victim of the MPAA being the MPAA. Need I remind you of Bully, another victim of the MPAA showing it's outdated policies.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 904 Election
PostPosted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 7:02 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
Another push toward R was David Novotny's, er, observation concerning Tracy Flick. Admittedly, it's one of the funniest dialogue segues/transitions in the film and probably ever =].


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection