It is currently Fri Oct 20, 2017 1:08 am

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:33 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 8:31 am
I paid with PayPal & was refunded/cancelled just today. They'll probably get around to everyone eventually.

I ordered from them once before, years ago, and IIRC it was a similar pricing snafu that they actually did honor. Oddly enough, I think it may have been for the Facets Dekalog set (it was either that or that big Chabrol set - which looked awful at the time and I can't imagine watching now).


Top
 Profile  
 

 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2016 1:34 pm 
Dot Com Dom
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2006 2:42 pm
Yep, just got my cancellation email. No big deal, was only planning on getting the Arrow for the extras anyways


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:56 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
I don't mean to be the weird paranoid Dekalog aspect ratio guy, but is it at all concerning that the Janus trailer for the restoration is entirely in 1.33:1? Same with the listing on Janus' website.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 4:59 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
I doubt it very much - when cutting a trailer, it's generally a very good idea to have the same aspect ratio throughout.

For instance, when I cut Arrow's Taviani Collection trailer, it made sense for me to reframe everything to 16:9, otherwise it would keep skipping between 1.66:1 and 1.85:1 in a distracting fashion.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Fri Aug 12, 2016 9:01 pm 

Joined: Fri Feb 27, 2015 9:02 am
I don't know who cut that resto trailer but I think he/she did Kieslowski proud. It really captures the essence and allure of the films.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Mon Aug 15, 2016 11:42 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
According to the Janus information sheet, the two relevant episodes are being presented in 1.70:1, in case anyone else was still concerned about this.

(And I also see that in the single past instance of multi-AR film, A Master Builder, the website only credited the 2.35:1 despite the packaging correctly listing both of them)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
Beaver

Quote:
Criterion's package is divided into 4 Blu-ray discs. The first has Dekalogs 1 thru 5, the second 6-10, the third Blu-ray has A Short Film About Killing and A Short Film About Love - while the fourth Blu-ray has the supplements.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 4:53 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, UK
A Short Film About Killing looks very green in the new caps. Hopefully someone with authority on the film can chime in as to whether that's accurate or another botched colour correction job.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:01 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
I take it you're familiar with this film's rather radical colour scheme? It's always been bilious green, as confirmed by plenty of late-1980s reviews - so this isn't remotely a Thief situation where 1981 comments about the extreme tinting are conspicuous by their absence.

Going from the screencaps, the Facets release looks badly off (possibly someone misguidedly "corrected" it) but the others look as intended.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:04 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
Fingers crossed they release a standalone of the "short films" disc at some point.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:08 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
I really dig the menu scheme, where the ten tiles of the cover are divided across to match the disc numbers, 1+2+3+4 being 10.

(It's for this same reason I can't imagine they'll do a standalone of the third disc any time in the foreseeable future)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Aug 17, 2016 5:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2016 12:54 pm
Location: Great Falls, Montana
Still going for Arrow's release myself but I'm excited at seeing those screenshots. They look great.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 12:44 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, UK
MichaelB wrote:
I take it you're familiar with this film's rather radical colour scheme? It's always been bilious green, as confirmed by plenty of late-1980s reviews - so this isn't remotely a Thief situation where 1981 comments about the extreme tinting are conspicuous by their absence.


Been a while since I last watched the AE DVD so I could be misremembering the colours.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 1:12 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
Glancing at the AE DVD, I think your memory isn't deceiving you - but I think that's been mistakenly "corrected" as well.

The crucial point is that these colours are supposed to be sickly and non-naturalistic, and green is very definitely dominant. As Wikipedia helpfully summarises:

Quote:
Kieślowski credits his cinematographer, Slawomir Idziak, for this deliberate visual unattractiveness within the film, stating: “I sense that the world is becoming more and more ugly. . . . I wanted to dirty this world. . . . We used green filters that give this strange effect, allowing us to mask all that isn’t essential to the image”. When Kieslowski first showed Idziak the screenplay, he commented, saying, “I can’t even read this! It disgusts me,” and then finally conceded, “I’ll shoot it only on the condition that you let me do it green and use all my filters, with which I’ll darken the image.” Kieslowski was not pleased, but he accepted the ultimatum, telling Idziak, “if you want to make green shit, it’s your affair.” The cinematographer concluded, “That’s how the graphic concept came about which Cahiers Du Cinema wrote that it was the most originally shot movie in the Cannes Film Festival.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 7:45 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 5:09 pm
Location: Edinburgh, UK
Thanks for clarifying, Mike. I do remember the green and dirty look from the AE DVD but I have to admit to doing a double take when I saw just how "in your face" so to speak the greens were in the new screenshots. Reassuring to hear that it was clearly by design and not somebody fucking around with the filters in DaVinci Resolve.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:27 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
The Blu-ray configuration will also bring up another long-standing issue: compression.

I think in the end, it should be minor and it should distract from my future enjoyment of this.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Fri Aug 19, 2016 11:30 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
I don't really see why they didn't put just one of the Dekalog episodes that were expanded on the Short Films disc and make that disc Disc 2 instead, just to relieve the compression a bit on one of the discs at least (whichever one has the longer runtime, I guess).


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:08 pm 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:55 pm
Criterion Dekalog is expected to release by the end of the month, but no reviews yet. Any news as to whether it is on track to release on the announced date? (I am paranoid after the "Tree of Wooden Clogs" news.)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 5:23 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Wed Nov 03, 2004 9:10 am
Location: Atlanta
DVD Beaver posted captures. Linked above.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 14, 2016 8:58 pm 
User avatar

Joined: Sun Aug 14, 2016 12:22 am
kekid wrote:
Criterion Dekalog is expected to release by the end of the month, but no reviews yet. Any news as to whether it is on track to release on the announced date? (I am paranoid after the "Tree of Wooden Clogs" news.)


DVDBeaver has captures. Film grain looks better than on the TVP blu, and the image has a slightly different aspect ratio (a little taller and a little less wide) that I think looks a little better (the tops of heads are no longer chopped off.) I think the lack of reviews is simply because of the set's length, and I'm sure Gary didn't exactly watch all sixteen or so hours of material on the set.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:12 am 

Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 9:55 pm
The restored version of Dekalog is one of the most amazing transformations I have seen. It is a great cinematic experience, presented here in all its staggering beauty. For me, this film is endlessly re-watchable, each time revealing new layers of meanings.I have made it a practice not to watch more than one episode on any given day, so I have seen only one episode so far from the Criterion version. I also watched the Insdorf talk, and found it very interesting. Question: Does Arrow use the same encode as the Criterion?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:18 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jun 13, 2014 1:14 pm
No, Arrow has only two episodes per disc but with extras spread throughout, which should mean it will probably average about 10mbps higher if not more.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:20 am 
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT
And the Arrow will be at a more true framerate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:41 am 
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 09, 2010 3:41 pm
Location: Framingham, MA
Got it yesterday and watched the first three (the next four will be later today and the last three will be on Thursday).

Caveat: I have a 32" television and I watch it about a foot or so away from me. Thus, I believe any compression issues are not as apparent to me. I do not deny there could be and it's probably more noticeable during darker scenes. But all that said, the restoration work is absolutely fantastic and this is what I have been waiting for a little over a decade since I last saw it.

For those so inclined, I had written my initial thoughts and impressions back in 2005. These do contain spoilers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: 837 Dekalog
PostPosted: Wed Sep 28, 2016 11:44 am 
User avatar

Joined: Fri Aug 11, 2006 6:20 pm
Location: Worthing
The Arrow will be at the correct 25fps (the TV broadcast framerate in Poland in 1988, for which Dekalog was initially exclusively made), although this does mean that importers from outside Europe need to be careful. But if you can play the BFI's Ken Russell, Peter Watkins or Alan Clarke discs (in the case of Russell, I mean The Great Passions and The Great Composers), you'll be able to play this one.

I believe the source masters are the same as the ones used by Criterion, but as Ribs says the Arrow encode should have a substantially higher bitrate. With five parts to a disc, the Criterion episodes cannot be bigger than 10 gigabytes apiece, but the Arrow encodes completed so far are all in the 16-18 gigabytes range, so we're talking at least half as much data again. They'll be in 1080i50 rather than 1080p24, but the "i" is slightly misleading as the image itself will be a fully progressive 25fps one, even though the BD spec technically doesn't permit such a thing. (The BFI used the same workaround with their TV discs.)

The formula is to devote something like two-thirds of each disc to Dekalog itself and use the rest for the extras, which will be (but can get away with being) more heavily compressed. With the exception of disc five, each disc contains two extras - a 1970s TV movie, and a context-setting piece (the doc Still Alive, the archival Kieślowski interview, the pieces by Tony Rayns and myself, all of which are in the 75-95 minute range). Disc five only adds the TV movie Short Working Day because that's in HD and so needs more space to breathe. (The other HD piece, Pedestrian Subway, is only half an hour long, so that issue doesn't arise.)

There was a lot of discussion about how best to present this material, and I think this is probably the most practical way of balancing out everything given that we couldn't stretch to more than five discs.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 187 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: zeroism


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group




This site is not affiliated with The Criterion Collection