520 Everlasting Moments

Discuss releases by Criterion and the films on them. Threads may contain spoilers!
Message
Author
User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#26 Post by HistoryProf » Fri Jun 11, 2010 2:43 am

I don't recall it having that level of grain when I saw it in the theater, but perhaps that's a matter of taking stills that capture detail missed in motion. It's a gorgeous film, and the cinematography does a wonderful job of adding a patina to it all that feels like the period. it's going to kill me to have to wait a few more weeks beyond release for the B&N sale to pick it up.

I still can't believe not a single review, let alone criterion, has failed to use a shot from the scene where the children are looking through the window while she takes her first paid photographs. It's absolutely haunting.

User avatar
movielocke
Joined: Fri Jan 18, 2008 12:44 am

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#27 Post by movielocke » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:24 am

I'd consider that shot a spoiler, it was so stunning and unexpected in the film. wouldn't want to ruin it for the people who haven't seen it. :)

User avatar
swo17
Bloodthirsty Butcher
Joined: Tue Apr 15, 2008 10:25 am
Location: SLC, UT

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#28 Post by swo17 » Fri Jun 11, 2010 10:39 am

So you'll have to wait two weeks to pick this up. Boo hoo. Some of us are still waiting to pick up the War Trilogy.

User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#29 Post by HistoryProf » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:39 pm

swo17 wrote:So you'll have to wait two weeks to pick this up. Boo hoo. Some of us are still waiting to pick up the War Trilogy.
hey, I am too! It only adds to the pain!

User avatar
HistoryProf
Joined: Mon Mar 13, 2006 3:48 am
Location: KCK

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#30 Post by HistoryProf » Fri Jun 11, 2010 4:39 pm

movielocke wrote:I'd consider that shot a spoiler, it was so stunning and unexpected in the film. wouldn't want to ruin it for the people who haven't seen it. :)
hence why i was purposefully vague. I didn't say WHAT she was photographing :)

User avatar
cdnchris
Site Admin
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 2:45 pm
Location: Washington
Contact:

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#31 Post by cdnchris » Fri Jun 25, 2010 1:41 am


claude
Joined: Thu Jan 14, 2010 3:55 am

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#32 Post by claude » Sun Jun 27, 2010 4:26 pm

2-3 hours ago I got banned from this board for posting a correction:
Starring: Maria Eiskanen, Mikael Persbrandt
Once again, it's Maria Heiskanen. There is no such name as Eiskanen, not in this world.

http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0374685/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

User avatar
Matt
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:58 pm

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#33 Post by Matt » Sun Jun 27, 2010 4:39 pm

No, you got banned for all this nonsense. But now I guess you're un-banned (?), so please feel free to continue insulting us all.

User avatar
jbeall
Joined: Sat Aug 12, 2006 9:22 am
Location: Atlanta-ish

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#34 Post by jbeall » Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:09 pm

Is it a spoiler that, for those still on the fence about whether or not to buy it, this film has not one but two fart jokes? The B&N sale can't come soon enough! :lol:

User avatar
Duncan Hopper
Joined: Mon Dec 21, 2009 5:16 am
Location: http://www.eldiabolik.com
Contact:

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#35 Post by Duncan Hopper » Thu Jul 01, 2010 4:06 pm

claude wrote:Once again, it's Maria Heiskanen. There is no such name as Eiskanen, not in this world.
Given some of your recent posts, I'd have to query which world it is you are referring to?
Is it the one that has Discos?

marnum
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 12:50 pm

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#36 Post by marnum » Sat Jan 01, 2011 7:51 am

I just re-watched this fine film, Maria Larssons eviga ögonblick. The film is pretty well based on true events, but how truthful is it? Was Maria really from Rääkkylä Finland, or is that just an excuse to hide the fact that Maria Heiskanen has a strong Finnish accent.

User avatar
Lemmy Caution
Joined: Wed Mar 29, 2006 3:26 am
Location: East of Shanghai

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#37 Post by Lemmy Caution » Sat Jan 01, 2011 8:39 am

As I recall, the setting of the film was switched from the city where the real Maria Larsson was from to Malmo, director Jan Troell's hometown.
It's not a documentary but a fictional retelling, so truthful seems like the wrong standard, if not an impossible one anyway.

User avatar
knives
Joined: Sat Sep 06, 2008 6:49 pm

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#38 Post by knives » Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:01 pm

This was a really great movie, but I'm curious as the the reason for the film to be narrated by the daughter. In no other aspect is she really considered a major part of the film making the narration seem a it weird.

User avatar
PfR73
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2005 6:07 pm

Re: 520 Everlasting Moments

#39 Post by PfR73 » Fri Jul 15, 2022 4:11 am

knives wrote:
Mon Dec 12, 2016 9:01 pm
This was a really great movie, but I'm curious as the the reason for the film to be narrated by the daughter. In no other aspect is she really considered a major part of the film making the narration seem a it weird.
The real-life daughter, Maja Larsson, was a relative of Troell's wife, who wrote the book & screenplay. She was interviewing Maja about family history in the 1980's and first heard the story of Maria and her photography, so I presume they wanted to stay true to the idea that this was a story told by Maja.

Post Reply